this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
494 points (97.0% liked)

Cars - For Car Enthusiasts

4619 readers
9 users here now

About Community

c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.


Rules





founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07 59 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Pop-up headlights disappeared because they were a PITA to maintain in working order.

Sooo many 'winking' cars because half the popups don't work, which is a massive saftey issue.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I remember it well lol. Back in the day, I had a Triumph TR7. I had to disconnect the headlight motors and run with them up, because of 'winking'.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Car designers also mostly used them since they were forced by regulation to use circular or rectangular lights of a standard size (think of all those 80s cars that look similar in the front). Pop up headlights allowed them to hide them and create cars that looked much different from the rest. I think there is a video from technology connections on the matter.

Edit: I think it is briefly mentioned on this video, although it’s been a while since I watched it: https://youtu.be/c2J91UG6Fn8

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd ENTHUSIASTICALLY return to the days of uniform, regulated headlights at a reasonable luminosity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'd enthusiastically return to the days of headlights that were made out of actual glass instead of plastic and didn't cost hundreds of dollars each.

[–] SpaceCowboy 4 points 2 weeks ago

Around here new cars have to have the lights on (but on a dimmer setting) whenever they're running. It's easier to see an oncoming car with lights on during the day when it's foggy or rainy. In conditions where lights don't improve the visibility of the road most people don't think to turn them on simply because it'll increase the visibility of their car to others.

So in places where lights are required to be always on, lights like these would only give a sleek look when the car is parked. Also aerodynamics are a consideration, and like you say they tend to break.

Just one of those fun little ideas that didn't work out for a number of reasons.

[–] MystikIncarnate 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. The technology of the time was pretty limiting. We have better tech and could do it better and more reliably but we don't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

SUV's have ruined the roads for everyone. Sporty fun cars need to make a comeback.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Even little things like the Toyota Mister Two and the Honda S2000. At one point, Toyota made a Celica that looked like a 7/8ths scale 70's Mustang.

I want a small, lightweight thing with a little more than necessary horsepower and a 5 speed manual, something that's actually fun to drive in normal road conditions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Toyota Mister Two

lmfao I have not heard that one before

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You've never heard someone call an MR2 that? How else do you pronounce MR2?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Kinda like "Ehm Arr Two"? Though English is not my native language, so it might be that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

(That's how it's officially pronounced but "mister two" is more fun)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I thought that everyone pronounced it your way...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

At one point, Toyota made a Celica that looked like a 7/8ths scale 70's Mustang.

Don’t worry, the Celica is supposed to be returning soon as a new entry in the GR line.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I agree. The world needs more drivable cars. Until this SUV/crossover trend ends, I'm hanging onto my 6-speed 350Z Roadster in Daytona Blue for the foreseeable future.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

We need mass-transportation and small, electric cars for when you absolutely have to drive yourself somewhere.

Our neighborhoods and roads are packed with massive trucks and vans and weird crossovers that look more and more like giant basketball shoes, and the people who drive them have statistically NEVER taken them off a paved road.

I mean, yeah I'm lefty #49764 ranting about transportation, but it's all because of the social manipulation by people who want to sell trucks that cost as much as houses and have unlimited access to our politicians. The only solution I'm offering here at this point involves creative home-engineering projects.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i wonder how many hit and run have there been because the driver didn't even realize he run over a child.

those gender affirming cars need to go

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Gender affirming cars is such a great term because the people who drive them are exactly the people who will be most offended by it. Definitely stealing that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Man, I miss those pop-up lights in cars. I heard they broke down often and were pretty trouble prone though...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

The pop-up headlights were a stopgap solution to a problem that no longer exists. They're a result of the DOT at the time flat out requiring that all cars sold in the US must use the same handful of dorky looking sealed beam headlamps, bar none, without exception. None of them were very attractive and certainly not aerodynamic, especially considering that they must be positioned with their massive flat faces perpendicular to the road in order to actually work.

Have you ever wondered why every car in the '70s and '80s seemed to have this same doofy Clark-Griswold's-station-wagon lookin' square (and sometimes, circular) headlight design?

It's because they had to, by law. Up until 1983 they didn't have a choice.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sorry, ill disagree because I prefer all earlier car designs to anything existing today. Cars now are pretty much all hideous as a whole. And a nightmare to fix as well. Thats a beauty of a Ford you posted. Im sure 0 people will agree.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree. Lights are too bright and distracting now also, and there seems to be no way to go back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

There's no likely way to go back, because sweeping good-for-all regulation that aesthetically inconveniences someone is political suicide in this selfish culture.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Plus back then, if you had a dead headlight for any reason, any service station will have a stock of all the four kinds of headlights at hand to replace.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Technology Connections made a great video on this a couple years back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

That was great, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

square (and later, circular)

Are the circular DOT headlights actually a newer regulation than the rectangular ones? I would've guessed that circular ones came first, if anything, considering the sorts of lights on VW Beetles and other cars designed in the 1930s and earlier.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I could have it the other way 'round. I wasn't paying close attention at the time.

Edit: Actually, you are right. The rectangular ones were permitted in 1974, so I did have that backwards. Corrected!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I would prefer to go back to that than to need to spend $500 to replace the proprietary LED module that cars have these days.

I am making an assumption but I would guess that it’s going to be really hard to come by spare parts like the LEDs in 10 or 20 years. While some company will still be making those rectangular headlights.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, I kinda wish it would come back. Forcing all manufacturers to use the same part for headlights had a singluar massive advatage that is gone now:

You could walk into any parts store and they always had the headlight you needed in stock, on the shelf.

Prices could be lowered dramatically as well because they were produced in such massive quantities. Sure, bulbs are more or less "cheap" now, but imagine being able to walk into any parts store and buy a pair of new LED headlights for your car for just $8 USD. You can't do that now (at least not here in California, the cheapest LED pair for lows only is like $30 at AutoZone), but you could if manufacturers had to use the same light module. And this same process could apply to any variety of other automotive parts.

Despite the limitation of the law requiring certain modules, cars back then had their own unique styling. Just looking at them, you knew exactly what make and model it was, and sometimes even the exact year. Nowadays, with no such limitation, I find cars to be more or less the same boring blobs driving down the road with a similar silhouette and in a paint variety of black, white, or grey/silver. I have to really pay attention to the taillights if I want to identify the make/model/year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I"m actually fine with that. I kinda prefer how, say, the 1980's Camaro looks compared to the swoopy plastic lens over plastic lens filled with LED fuckpuke they build today.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I have the car in the top picture and kids love seeing the popups.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Just got my Miata a a few weeks ago and I love that it's understood that we have to blink/wink every time we encounter each other

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I miss my NA Miata dearly, but my back and legs sure don't 😞.

Using the popups was always the best part, partially because I liked to imagine she was helping me watch the road ahead of us.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From getting in and out or from stiff suspension? I can understand that. It's a long way up and down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

From being 6'5" / 195cm unfortunately. I unironically felt like the tall guy from the Simpsons. IIRC the suspension was OEM and I didn't think it was too stiff. I loved the ride height though. Really felt like zipping around in a go kart!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

That would do it haha. At 6'1" I had to change the steering wheel and take off the sun visors. Comfortable for me but a snug fit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

100% bullshit. When rectangular headlights were first proposed, UL was initially reluctant to add yet another headlight standard, but the manufacturer responded that it would improve safety by lowering the front end profile. The headlights got approved, and the very next year they stacked them.

load more comments
view more: next ›