this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1481 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8522 readers
4140 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I remember being puzzled by this and many other numbers that kept cropping up. 32, 64, 128, 256, 1024, 2048... Why do programmers and electronic engineers hate round numbers? The other set of numbers that was mysterious was timber and sheet materials. They cut them to 1220 x 2440mm and thicknesses of 18 and 25mm. Are programmers and the timber merchants part of some diabolical conspiracy?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Powers of two are the roundest of numbers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

32, 64, 128 etc. are all round numbers, counting in binary. They are powers of two. Since computers work in binary, they make logical sense.

1220mm is 4ft, and 18 and 25mm are three-quarters of an inch, and an inch respectively.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

They were making a joke. That being said, im not familiar with lumber or imperial<->metric conversions so their second point was lost on me, so thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Still odd, I very much doubt they use a 8bit variable to set this limit. What would this bring ?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Still odd

Actually, it's even.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Because 257's a crowd

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Wouldn't max value for 8 bit (unsigned) integer be 255? Like the number has 256 distinct values, but that includes 0.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Right but having a group chat of size 0 isn’t very useful.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to be snarky, in programming there's rarely (in situations like this) a reason to keep count. Computers are exceptionally good at counting integers so they'd just count individual client id's (however they've implemented that system), not keeping toll on how many clients are in a group chat.

So one client, be it at position zero is a one client group. Add another client at position one and you have two clients and a two person group.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And programmers usually start counting at 0.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Your thinking indexing, 0 is still 0 when counting.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

The number of distinct values are what matters.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

That's a super old article as well.

They got rightfully roasted in the comments for not knowing even the most basic things about computing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's app starting from 1 the scrubs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I remember thinking something similar when I was a kid modding Starcraft. Max levels/ranks in researching was 256 and I always wondered why such a weirdly specific number.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›