this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
6 points (66.7% liked)

Canada

9546 readers
1221 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter
mp3
otters_raft
6
Reflecting on Canada's F-35 decision: F-35 fighter jets can only fly 50% of the time (archive.ph)
submitted 2 years ago by zephyreks to c/canada
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The fleet’s mission-capable rate — or the percentage of time a plane can perform one of its assigned missions — was 55 per cent as of March 2023, far below the Pentagon’s goal of 85 per cent to 90 per cent, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday.

Part of the challenges stem from a heavy reliance on contractors for maintenance that limits the Pentagon’s ability to control depot maintenance decisions. Delays also arise from spare parts shortages, inadequate maintenance training, insufficient support equipment, and a lack of technical data needed to make repairs.

Because of the Pentagon's inane IP laws, maintenance on these planes is a bureaucratic nightmare: defense contractors are able to limit maintenance of these things to only those they contract because of IP restrictions and are not required to teach the military jack shit. Meanwhile, they're essentially a paperweight half the time because they're not getting proper maintenance.

How are we supposed to patrol the Arctic with a plane that needs an American private subcontractor to perform essential maintenance on it?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There really weren't any options. The only question now is do we go to only one fighter jet type or have a mixed fleet.

[–] corsicanguppy 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It certainly was painted as if there were no options.

In a world where other countries exist with their own fighter planes, I bet there were alternatives.

[–] someguy3 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There really aren't, read into it. Everyone's buying the F35 and there is nothing else if you want something that will actually be good at war.

I want them (the US) to make a new non-stealthy fighter because right now there are no other options, but it will take at least a decade. It won't be good at war but can be cheaper to do patrols and escort away intruding Russian planes.