this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
174 points (96.8% liked)

World News

54943 readers
3800 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran has enough material to make at least 10 nuclear warheads but extracting it would be very risky, say experts

The Trump administration is reportedly considering the deployment of special forces into Iran to secure its stockpile of highly enriched uranium (HEU), which experts say could be used to make at least 10 nuclear warheads.

Preventing Iran from acquiring a bomb is one of Trump’s stated war aims, and the 440kg HEU stockpile represents the greatest nuclear threat as it could be turned into weapons-grade uranium relatively easily. The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has told Congress that “people are going to have to go and get it”.

Rubio did not go into greater detail, but there have been US and Israeli reports on discussions between the two countries on how such a mission might be carried out by special forces from either or both militaries. But nuclear experts say the complexity and risk involved would be considerable.

MBFC
Archive

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Preventing Iran from acquiring a bomb is one of Trump’s stated war aims

Something that could have been achieved through continued negotiations, resulting in far fewer lives lost and less money wasted. Assassinating Iran's leaders and threatening to invade only serves to bolster their justifications for seeking nuclear weapons in the first place.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point Iran having the bomb would be more stabilizing for the region than if they are prevented from it.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I predict the US will sell Iran some bombs ro bring stability back to the region. I'll bet 2 dimes and a nickel on this.

[–] floofloof 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's also something they claimed to have achieved last year when they bombed Iran.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing Yahoo has been claiming functional nukes since 2012.

[–] floofloof 1 points 1 week ago

Netanyahu has been lying that Iran is weeks away from having functional nukes since at least 1995:

https://youtu.be/p0mEWmfbdIE

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is this the nuclear stockpile that Trump destroyed last year?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

That was the enrichment facility, but Iran won't have kept the output it generated prior to it being bombed there.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's the stockpile that's perfectly collocated with the military positions controlling the strait of Hormuz, oil fields, refineries, and other strategic economic positions. They didn't even bother with the made up intel from UK this time.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

The one that they wouldn't have even had if not for the pedophile ripping up the anti proliferation treaty with Iran during his first turn? With no replacement. On whim. For no legitimate reason.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not even a weapon of mass destruction but a literal pile of radioactive metal that "could" be turned into a bomb.

This is about imaginary as you could possibly get. Truly war theatre for the masses that are apparently dumb enough to believe it.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The American masses are getting dumber so the lies can be lazier.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I have to agree here. It is like they aren't even trying anymore.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The nuclear stockpile that Trump said was destroyed over a year ago in a previous strike? And which probably didn't exist in the first place?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

I voted for Trump because I was tired of Wars and now I need to vote Trump AGAIN to Stop the War that Trump started To Protect the State of Pedophiles!

-Literally EVERYONE who Votes Republican!

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, ground war it is. Sounds like a quagmire in the making.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The mountains of Iran are not for the faint of heart.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump probably thinks Iran is a flat desert suitable for tanks, and not in fact surrounded by mountains.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right! Every time I see something like this I wonder that people don't realise the terrain around Tehran and the north-west. A ground invasion against Iran would make Afghanistan look like a picnic in comparison.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, let me get this straight. The US and Israel started a war, allegedly, to stop the Iranian nuclear bomb project, without any actual plan on how to remove the nuclear programme assets?

[–] floofloof 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, they boasted that their bombing of Iran last year had completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program. And the experts say there never even was an Iranian nuclear bomb program worth the name.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk 11 points 1 week ago

WMDs are baaack, baby!

Lord Farquaad don't give a shit.

[–] HumanOnEarth 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yet....yet..... there are sources in the government who have been in closed door meetings say the real reasons have nothing to do with Iran's nuclear program.

So one is the narrative they're selling, the other is the truth.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm putting my money on the narrative that they clearly didn't plan for and are still trying to figure out being the fake one.

[–] floofloof 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The real narrative may have just been that Netanyahu has always wanted to destroy Iran and Trump was stupid and vain enough to be persuaded to do it for him. Since Trump can't admit a mistake, he has to double down.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I feel like if Iran really wants nukes fast, they should just ship that uranium and some cash to NK to have it enriched to weapons grade.

Maybe exchange the missile technology for their warhead design too.

Cuz even though we already are highly aware the US is lying when they say it could be refined super easily in the middle of a war, any attempt to do so would immediately get noticed and promptly bombed.

...

Actually a funnier idea would be to place a bunch of fake inflatable enrichment cylinders in some random location in the mountains so that the US and Israel waste their muntions on a fake encirchment facility lol.

Not even to protect the real one, just to make them turn their attention away from everything else and bomb an empty mountain.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Has it been 20 years of this "Iran nukes!" business?

Let Israel "secure the nuclear stockpile", they're right there already, we don't need to buy them a boat or anything

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am a little confused about all this as all of the analysts claim that this material is literally under tons of rubble. Are the special forces going to be bringing excavators and cranes?

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a vibe-based war, they're just going to show up and wing it.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"going to" as if thats not what already has happened

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, we all understand that the recent reporting of "weighing" and "considering" and "exploring" probably means that US boots are already on the ground inside Iran, right?

[–] GuyIncognito 5 points 1 week ago

I expect if any US soldiers were on the ground in Iran, Iran would release a video of the prisoners

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This mother fucker rebliterated the nukes just to send troops in and take them back

Trump kids first