this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
94 points (97.0% liked)

Comics

1311 readers
515 users here now

Post your comics here. Single or multi boxed comics.

Please mark nsfw when appropriate.

Same rules as primary server, no hate.

Please warn others if there may be triggers.

Please mark if the comic is yours either in the title or description

obvious ai images will be removed, please include a source to prevent this

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I think we just ran out of room in the womb for how long we really should be in there developing and shit.

This is like evolutions wonky path to letting us have big ass brains but not always kill the mom when we pop out.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Disclaimer: I have no professional knowledge in this field. Everything I know about it, which is almost nothing, is either from reading cracked.com in the good old days or from witnessing my wife be pregnant and birth a baby.

That said, from my understanding, the issue is less the womb and more the pelvis.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This theory is called the, "obstetrical dilemma," and it's been mostly debunked.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what I get for sourcing my knowledge from Cracked, I suppose. Thank you for the update.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No problem. And, to be fair, this study is only 8 years old, so it's very possible Cracked was citing the prevailing scientific theory at the time.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could be both too, but I'm also not a scientist and don't care enough to go sleuthing through the internet for real scientific theories or hypotheses on the (under)development of human babies compared to other mammals.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This theory has apparently been mostly debunked, so my disclaimer has been justified. I'm rarely an expert, so don't go by what I say! That said, I appreciate the follow-up.

edit: For the debunking, see the response to my other comment.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it's the tradeoff of not [edit laying not having i am the stupid today] eggs. i think. i don't know i feel like i'm getting into wild ass scifi speculation and i have belonged to some cults (and tried to convince them that they become omnipotent spiders/salmon hybrids when they die trust me it is better than what their cult wanted them to believe you don't want me to start getting into it) so like, we hatch the egg (water breaks) inside the mother's body and there's just this straw we gotta claw through to get out, right? only one other route out.

the straw is easier for both of us, even if it's episiotomore trouble than we were planning.

It's called late-game maxxing

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

humans are sort of unique on this point, our babies are the most worthless and require the longest period of immaturity and dependence before developing

https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/why-humans-give-birth-to-helpless-babies/

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other animals Zerg rush, but we sit back and tech up

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Protoss-ass species, smh

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

We develop at 3~5 years, the reason we get born with undeveloped brainholes are pelvis constrictions & a societal (& tech?) ability to take care of helpless lil embryos.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bloodied rabbit with a knife. Overgrowth reference?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Or Sluggy Freelance.