this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
551 points (99.8% liked)

196

16910 readers
1465 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Me reading a study that milk tea boba drinks lead to depression and addiction ๐Ÿ™„

[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a study with a sample size of one that concludes that people shouldn't drink milk tea because of the intense gas pain that follows. You should see my p value. It's glorious.

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interestingly enough, there is a design that still works with a single person... But it requires a bunch of time points. In other words, you can prove milk tea is bad for you in particular by drinking it enough times and having terrible gas and/or diarrhea to improve that p value.

You naturally can't extrapolate that to others in the population but at least you'll definitively prove you probably have lactose intolorance!

[โ€“] BeigeAgenda 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Studies show that if you drink a lot of tea, you get a high p value.

I'll see myself out...

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Qualitea P, in fact.

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm so glad I didn't see that. I hate just now easy it is for things to get published and, worse, draw media attention.

Although if I had to guess, it isn't the sample size and sds so much as drawing stupid conclusions from correlations without using controls for things that actually lead to depression and addiction. (Like the wine is good for you studies that ignore the benefits of wealth, ugh)

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The wine is good for you did not ignore the benefits of wealth.

It first ignored the fact that the initial study was of Japanese doctors and maybe having a medical education made you more likely to adopt healthier practices.

The next study ignored wealth.

The next study ignored education and wealth.

It proceeds to be bad study after bad study until 20 or so years after the first study when someone thought "what if the non-drinking crowd included people who were alcoholics and people who had to stop drinking because of health problems?" Turns out when you only focus on non-drinkers who never regularly drank and compared them with wine drinkers the wine drinking crowd has a lot more health issues.

I work in the wine business and I laugh every time I see a new study to see what they ignored to conclude wine was a health food

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Wine as a health food is such wishful thinking, haha. I have the privilege of learning some advanced statistical methods in grad school and so many of those issues are easily accounted for with better data and models.

Or, you know, common sense. Lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Oooh, a statically-significant burn. Nice.

[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reading about medical research on trans people: "4 of the 16 patients studied...." Like why are we even doing rhis

[โ€“] jjagaimo 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Usually case studies and smaller studies like that help to inform hypotheses and gather information about potential issues or confounding variables before running larger or full scale experiments. They're also cheaper and can help with garnering interest and investment

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'm currently trying to get a small study accepted into a conference made by my wife and myself, seconding this comment

[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey man, I had a time limit on my project so it wasn't like I could've done all the experiments I wanted, okay? I did the best with what I had...

I think I might've taken this a little too personally

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

cries in factorial experimental design

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

!science_[email protected] is applicable

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know who ate all the donuts?

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

burps a cloud of powdered sugar

wasn't me!

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just where is the drawing from?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Some splatoon fan art