We are witnessing the big issue with gerrymandered districts.
The more gerrymandered the more batshit insane people you get into office since they always win their primaries and then will always win the general.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
We are witnessing the big issue with gerrymandered districts.
The more gerrymandered the more batshit insane people you get into office since they always win their primaries and then will always win the general.
Anything could happen but I don't think this guy has a chance amazing McCarthy. I'm sure McCarthy has pretty deep ties in his district. I'd love it if Giglio beat McCarthy and then a moderate Democrat won the seat though.
If you're trying to gerrymander in a sinister way you don't want to win counties in a land slide. You want to split up your opponents' counties and concentrate the rest in as few counties as possible so that they lose.
Here's an example with two parties: X and O
Undivided population:
XXXXXXOOOOOO
Situation 1:
XXX XXX OOO OOO
Situation 2:
XXO XXO XXO OOO
Situation 1 is probably the fairest because the population is 50/50 and they have 2 X representatives and 2 O representatives.
Situation 2 is gerrymandered by party X to give them 3 representatives, but it takes fewer Xs to switch and damage the majority. The Os have no real X challengers in the 4th district (OOO).
Current trends say they both lose.
Don't tease me!
Do we lose too tho?
Dude should probably get to work arranging his next gig as a Fox "News" contributor.
That's definitely probable