In order for that debate to even take place, it has to be proven that "consciousness" exists on some special level.
There's no proof that there is some special sauce that is "consciousness" beyond just synapses, hormones and chemicals.
In other words, It's very likely that consciousness falls under the category of "if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck..."
My answers aren't dictated by an awareness of self; they're dictated by a chemical hormonal soup that we pretend is some grand concept of self-awareness.
it's not hard to tell that it's a painting after even a cursory glance.
But the question is, would it have been harder to spot as a painting if I hadn't been told it was a painting before clicking on it?
I dunno. But I still think it's very obviously a painting. A very good one, for sure. But not quite as photorealistic as this thread seems to want to ooh and aahhh about.