BlameThePeacock

It's nothing but a pipe dream at this point, and ground bases will still be necessary.

This was my response last time, Canada isn't optional, most ballistic missile paths from Russia and China pass over Canada and detecting them would require radar architecture in Canada

Instead of fighting over your country, you should be fighting for your religion. -The Pope

This shit is too grey for the courts to handle properly.

Even with a video or audio recording, it's impossible to know state of mind.

As we see with this case, they can actively be saying yes or engaging with people and then say they felt they had no choice but to participate.

Without video or audio recordings, these things almost always come down to context at best, or just they said/they said at worst.

How can our justice system find anything to be true in these situations "beyond a reasonable doubt" at that point?

I'm not detracting from sexual assault being bad, it is, I'm just pointing out that there isn't a reasonable way to fix it that I've heard so far and we can't just believe every victim because we know that it's being abused (even if it's rare) by malicious actors to punish people that committed no crime.

The only actual solution I have at this point is we should just all start fucking robots, because people are stupid.

They do not need to be willing to sell, Eminent domain is part of the 5th amendment and government can use it to seize pretty much anything for 'public use' but it does call for compensation

Yes, it kept improving

Cheez wiz, as the name implies its a cheese spread that comes in a jar.

Just nationalize SpaceX at this point for "national security reasons"

Yup, by excluding the south east (Texas to Florida) they could easily reboot it in a much more progressive manner.

Nobody said it had to be publicly available to be developed or used. Governments can push this along just fine.

Economic sanctions haven't worked against Russia so far, why would they work against China or India or whoever else wants to do it.

Why would China or Russia agree to an anti-ai treaty? Those technologies benefit their objectives quite heavily.

Even if they said they would, unlike military assets like missiles, hiding a datacenter's use case is trivial.

It's not like Russia(or the US) has been following existing treaty rules scrupulously even with the current stuff.

And no, you can't regulate bias. Deep fakes... Some of it, but definitely not all of it. Commercial stuff from Microsoft or meta may be able to he regulated, but if there's any benefit to not doing so customers will just purchase services from outside the country to accomplish that.