I don't even think they could be legally prosecuted in Canada at that age, let alone placed in a detention facility.
Even if they murdered someone they may just get handed to a mental healthcare situation rather than juvenile detention.
I don't even think they could be legally prosecuted in Canada at that age, let alone placed in a detention facility.
Even if they murdered someone they may just get handed to a mental healthcare situation rather than juvenile detention.
I could fairly easily ask a human artist to draw me something that would infringe on a copyright for a character they had never even seen before. It would technically be against the law, but given that no other parties know about it, it's unlikely to ever get caught. The legal problems arise if I use that art in a visible fashion such that the copyright holder would find out, and then it would be me getting sued, not the artist.
If you don't want to meet her with the kids, there's little point in meeting her at all. You aren't going to be hanging out regularly because she will have kids that need to be tended, so why push.
As a parent, we only hang out with other parents at this point, and generally only those that we have developed a relationship with via kids activities (school, sports, etc) because it's much easier to maintain that relationship when you see them 2-3 times a week for here, or can schedule a lunch/dinner before or after the mutual here that you know you will both be attending.
"Shit's fucked, eh?" -Eby and every other politician
A realistic take on the situation.
I fully agree, despite how much people hate AI, training itself isn't infringement based on how copyright laws are written.
I think we need to treat it as the copier situation, the person who is distributing the copyright infringing material is at fault, not the tool used to create it.
Significant additional fireproofing in homes, and especially in beds.
EKG required for anyone overweight or older than 60 before engaging the services of an escort.
A lot more murders occur and go unsolved due to a lack of evidence.
My wife agrees.
I thought you were talking about some obscure car until number 4
That won't hurt, but it won't fix the issue. There are places with little to no zoning that have gone up in value just as fast as everywhere else.
Japan has practically zero zoning, and yet Tokyo is still more expensive per square foot than any Canadian city in terms of the core area and that's with a population that's in decline. They built tiny to keep things barely affordable, but theres no reason why Canada should need to go anywhere near that level of density with the amount of land we have even in just the reasonable parts of Canada.
Isn't that period exactly when developers stopped building new dedicated rental housing and put us into this hole we're currently in?
The article states that CMHC saw no difference between rent controlled and non-rent controlled markets in rental starts, but ignores the fact that overall rental starts dropped.
Short term gains, for long term pain.
What we need is Land Value Taxes, short term pain for long term gain. Unfortunately there just aren't enough people willing to vote away the current system.
This is 100% the case.
Still the prevailing mindset in some less developed countries
They didn't even name them until they were older because they lost so many early.