BlemboTheThird
joined 2 years ago
Evil Villains In Love
Unfortunately I don't know the physics, maybe something to do with how lights scatters through the windshield? Idk, all I can tell you is my repeated experience: turning the brights on definitely helps with seeing through oncoming traffic. But you are right, my older car is both smaller and lower, so I'm sure even the modern cars with lights aimed downward are more likely to shine directly at me
Netflix+prime+Disney is a solid $60 a month, getting more expensive all the time, and you'll probably still wind up wanting shows that aren't on any of them. Idk how crazy your hardware is or how much power you're using but it's hard for me to imagine your home setup could be more expensive than that over more than a year or two
I mean I guess I'm stupid but I straight up can't see if there's oncoming traffic and my brights aren't on. Doesn't go for every oncoming car (if its lights are reasonable then I have no issues) but the vast majority of cars have newer, hilariously bright headlights that shine in a way where my normal lights simply don't seem to cut it.
Meanwhile I'm out here driving a 20 year old car with correspondingly dim headlights and need to have the highbeams on just to be able to see anything when there's oncoming traffic. My normal headlights are fine when there's nothing coming the other way, but that's not really how that's supposed to work lol. Kinda defeats the purpose of ever turning the brights off! I swear any newer car's normal lights are brighter than my brights
And also vote in their own interest. Near as I can tell, their lack of belief in the system stems from their lack of interest in learning about it as much as its actual flaws. One of the big strengths of conservatives is drawing in first time voters who don't know jack about squat by playing on their fears--as racist and stupid as those fears may be.
Vance might not be The Guy, but I disagree that removing Trump solves the problem at all. He's more like the most prominent symptom.
Before 2016, Trump in the minds of most Americans was some washed up reality show star from the 90s. He is, and has always been, an ugly, uncharismatic, racist piece of shit. If the conservative propaganda machine can propel this artificially colored, barely articulate moron to the top, they can propel just about anyone. The only caveat is that whoever they propel has to be willing to do anything, to destroy any international relationship, to flip flop at the drop of a hat, and to not ask questions outside of "how will this benefit me?"
Vance might be a selfish, uncharismatic idiot in his own right, but unlike Trump he does have two braincells to rub together. Fox, Newsmax, Rogan, and the like might not be willing to throw themselves behind that. But there's no shortage of vaguely remembered, self-absorbed celebrities who will be willing to take his place. Think President Oz, or heck, maybe Hulk Hogan would throw his hat in the ring.
Point is, as long as we have a populace that disrespects education and science, and that's completely unmotivated to participate in our gerrymandered and unrepresentative FPTP system, the propaganda machine will always churn out a shittier asshole next year. The worst of us will hand them the reigns, and Republicans will follow that asshole without question. Trump isn't as special a case as people want to believe. We've been on this trajectory for decades.
I'm sure there's no shortage of actual stupid people, but don't forget that he's posting to truth social. Something tells me they lack robust bot detection measures.
I'm overthinking it, but it's maybe not as dark as it's meant to look. I mean, she clearly survived being turned into an axe. And hey, with this guy chopping down trees entirely by hand, maybe he's the type to make his own tools. They could actually wind up together!
I'm seeing a problem...