Who uses 568a?
DankOfAmerica
The 3rd dude is a reverse Popeye with a massive upper arm and thin forearm.
Those extra 10mm in the A10 are very important, especially for supporting ground combat. It's used to fire at heavily armored targets such as tanks. Also, the A10 's targeting system is more advanced and precise, though that could potentially be implemented on the Corsair. Regardless, the Warthog has better armor, making it more resilient to ground fire from the enemy. I believe that the A10 is better designed for ground combat support than the Corsair.
What congressional representatives are you contacting so that I can counter your arguments with them?
Crack addiction is so sad. The war on drugs has been such a disaster. Look at people that are addicted to crack and assess if they're having a good life at everyone else's expense. They're absolutely not. Yet, we punish them by placing them in steel and concrete cages for years, make their lives much more difficult afterwards, then expect them to not use when they get out.
That band is ridiculous. Fun to listen to, but I would probably not function well as friends with their main followers. They seem a bit intense and chaotic.
It's a Mars Beach Boy/Girl D-10 Million Years Summerrrr!! 🌅🌊🏖️⛱️👽
The anti-American circle jerk is irritating and a bit hypocritical. There are very few countries that haven't done fucked up shit, so that's where I think the hypocrisy comes in. However, I think the real damage is the division it grows. It draws lines by nationality instead of more helpful characteristics such as values, ideals, and goals. We all have a lot more in common than we have differences. I tend to believe that things could improve if we work together towards a common goal rather than going around stereotyping and placing blame. Personally, I don't think that an "us vs them" model is the best approach. We're all here in this together. Maybe we could work towards understanding, inclusion, collaboration, and interdependence while accepting and even celebrating each other's differences.
Maybe instead of "winning", y'all could debate to understand. You might even get a better outcome that includes both perspectives.
You're right. It won't be 90% of the world population, but it would definitely be more than 90% of the countries involved (e.g. NATO, Russia, and China). As far as the world population, people in countries of the southern hemisphere might have more chances at surviving, but with geopolitics changed that drastically with an impossible to resolved food shortage, things could become chaotic pretty quickly. Don't argue with me. Here are the sources I based my opinion on.
-
Kurzgesagt video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrIRuqr_Ozg
-
Their background sources: https://sites.google.com/view/sources-nuclear-winter
Aside from that, I find it weird that the governor of a state has repeatedly spoken on behalf of the entire state illegitimately declaring what is and isn't welcomed in the state. In the past, he said something about Florida is where woke goes to die. It's a weird thing to do because the governor is the lead executive of a state government, not the cultural voice of the entire state. As far as I can tell, the state legislature decides who and what is welcomed in a state through laws. Aside from that, the population itself would be its own voice. Am I wrong? Does any other governor do that?
Disclaimer: I don't disagree with the Andrew Tate thing, but I find it weird that a governor is making these statements.