FundMECFSResearch

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

we’ve got a couple regulars posting on [email protected] so we get atleast two posts a week nearly no matter what which is cool.

I don’t think we need to force ourselves to be more active than that. Threads that get big on our community attract a lot of non-disabled people who say discriminatory stuff and it becomes a moderation headache.

The comm was intended as a support group but sometimes becomes a sort of debate group when non-disabled people try to share their “views” on our disabilities. So those big threads may not really be serving their purpose.

@[email protected] is really carrying it with their weekly threads.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks cool. I’m voluntarily blocking lemmy.ml so I can’t see your community. But if you move it I’ll be happy to scroll through, I love fantasy genre.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think the best way to go is have a suscribed feed for nicheish and low-medium post density communities you like.

And then use the c/all feed as a sort of frontpage thing where you get memes and news and stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think there is confusion about what transmedicalism encompasses and what it does not.

Transmedicalism is the view that the mental state of transgenderism is caused by “gender dysphoria” a mental illness.

Gender affirming care does not require transmedicalism, and in fact many transmedicalists are against gender affirming care.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Some societies and cultures allow for forms of changing your gender, or have other gender roles that fulfil these (Fa'afafine, Hirjas etc.).

The concept of “mental disorder”/“mental illness”/“mental issue” just like “gender” is a social construct.

In a society where these other genders or changing genders is not commonly allowed, like modern western cultures, someone who doesn’t fit into the binary vision of gender might be seen as having a “disorder”.

Just like back in the day, in a society where gayness is erased and does not exist, a gay person might be seen as having a mental disorder.

But if we say being transgender is just a normal part of human diversity, like being gay — which I hope is the case, then it is not a “disorder”.

It’s very important to note that what is considered a “disorder” or not is very much a social construct.

Note: I’m not trans. If you notice any misconceptions or mistakes, please correct me. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He lowkey looks like Mark Hamil

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Yep. It was a feature people kept on shouting at the devs that they needed. The devs kept trying to explain how an open protocol works and that everything they post is open. But no one seemed to get it so they just added this feature with the caveat it only works for people using the Bluesky PBC’s app and website.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Well no, but I guess supportive transmedicalism is a step in the right direction, even if it’s still quite fucked.

(Equivalent being back in the day seeing being gay as being a mental disorder).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Probably is. And according to this study yes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Completely agree.

But I also think if you have the priviledge to be able to minimise waste yourself, you should definitely do it.

 

[email protected]

Is the TV show or community transphobic or something?

 

Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) is retiring, opening up a battleground Senate seat in the 2026 midterms. 

Why it matters: It's a stunning announcement for a senator who led Democrats' Senate campaigns two cycles in a row. And it's an opening for Republicans in a state President Trump won in November.

 

The country’s biggest civil service union has written to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to express its “disgust” that it has entered into a media partnership with **The Sun**newspaper, which it accuses of “demonising benefit claimants”. 

 

They are not specifically anarchist, probably democratic socialist, though I’ve been pushing them more and more to the left (they started off as neolib), and I think Trump getting elected really disillusioned them with the prospect of reformism actually making meaningful change.

They basically asked me, “It’s fucking crazy over here. People are dying and Trump is fucking up everything. I feel so helpless and hopeless. Do you have any resources on things to do?”

Do you guys have links I could send. Cheers.

 

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for improved infectious aerosol concentrations through interventions that reduce the transmission of airborne infections. The aims of this review were to map the existing literature on interventions used to improve infectious aerosol concentrations in hospitals and understand challenges in their implementation.

Methods

We reviewed peer-reviewed articles identified on three databases, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2024. 6417 articles were identified, 160 were reviewed and 18 were included.

Findings

Results on aerosol concentration were discussed in terms of three categories: (1) filtration and inactivation of aerosol particles; (2) effect of airflow and ventilation on aerosol concentrations; and (3) improvements or reduction in health conditions. The most common device or method that was outlined by researchers was high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters which were able to reduce aerosol concentrations under investigation across the included literature. Some articles were able to demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions in terms of improving health outcomes for patients.

Interpretation

The key finding is that infectious aerosol concentration improvement measures based on filtration, inactivation, improved air flow dynamics, and ventilation reduce the likelihood of nosocomial infections. However limitations of such approaches must be considered such as noise pollution and effects on ambient humidity. Whilst these efforts can contribute to improved air quality in hospitals, they should be considered with the other interacting factors such as microclimates, room dimensions and use of chemical products that effect air quality.

Funding

This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (NIHR205439).

view more: ‹ prev next ›