LGTM

joined 3 weeks ago
 

Bonuses

ow

human is not doing job properly

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

8mo ago? You're a legend

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

New dry herb vaporizer arriving tomorrow, planning to share photos on [email protected]

Not exactly productive, but you asked :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

You are an amazing person and I love you, fantastic contribution

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I literally just saw a merge sort meme with marge

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I don't rlly wanna see straight porn (no hate, just not my thing xd) and honestly, I was in a pretty good spot. Then someone told me I was scrolling active instead of hot and OH MY- that's a lot of porn

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Super surprising that you said this, I took a bigger picture and cropped it, I thought everyone would complain the quality is shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Yes!!! Jaw dropped when I say xi for the first time, though I will say I was astounded that mathemeticians use so many simple letters with font styling that are easy to confuse, like how am I supposed to differentiate 𝖌 in writing from polynomial g 💀

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Guys I am devastated, I realized I was doing the problem wrong and I didn't even use this legend of a letter

53
fake letter rule (discuss.tchncs.de)
 

I was trying to write 𝔅, but I find this strangely pretty

 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/29979244

Clearly it must be (left) noetherian! (Since we wouldn't want a ascending subnormal chain that doesn't stop where all of the elements are enjoyed by the larger ideals/submodules) :)

Sorry, writing "R is comm(unitive)" so many times can make you do things

Might be enjoyed here xd

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I'm so tired of transcendental apologists; their lack of a minimal polynomial does NOT permit them to act like this. ϕ was our compromise

11
Let R be a communist ring... (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Clearly it must be (left) noetherian! (Since we wouldn't want a ascending subnormal chain that doesn't stop where all of the elements are enjoyed by the larger ideals/submodules) :)

Sorry, writing "R is comm(unitive)" so many times can make you do things

2
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A really beautiful piece by my former composition teacher. This is the one that really inspired me to someday compose my own music. Unfortunately, I lost contact with him after he had lost someone close to him I think, but I'm happy that he looks like he's doing well. Please enjoy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, thanks! That video was really great, I do kinda like the breakcore sound, hope it doesn't stay a meme genre (or as he says in the video) :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Haha I figured it'd be more conplicated than I thought

How are broken beats different from normal beats in percussion? Is it like stopping the snare from ringing so it gives that bare sort of sound?

 

Hello everyone,

There's a rhythm that I like but I'm not all too familiar with its name. Here are some examples:

It could be that they're not related at all and I just like hearing double time, but I think I've heard the term DnB before, but I've never had it properly defined. Thanks!

19
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I don't know if the proof is right because answers to Rotman's exercises are hard to find (for me)

Tbh this should be marked as NSFW, math gore

EDIT: re-read it and I didn't mention that there are no factors that permute roots between g and h since the intersection of their Galois groups is trivial, also not sure if xi and gamma are even elements in the subgroup of S_n (they should be cause the proposition is true, idk how to explicitly show D:)

7
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

On a 50/50 too, yippee I love meta I love meta I love meta I lo

107
profound rule (discuss.tchncs.de)
 
 

I wanted to maybe start making PeerTubr videos, but then I realized I've never had to consider my voice as part of my threat model. A consequence that immediately comes to mind is potentially having your voice trained on by AI, but I'm not (currently) in a position where others would find it desirable to do so. Potentially in the future?

I'd like to know how your threat model handles your personal voice. And as a bonus, how would voice modulators help your voice in/prevent your voice from being more flexible in your threat model? Thanks!

159
What's the deal with Signal? (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I don't know if I'm opening a can of worms here, and I'm still trying to backtrack a lot of history where I was tuning everything out. I keep seeing random swipes at Signal (or the representatives (?)), and I was wondering whether they are founded or just lies.Is it another situation like Lemmy where we just "take the technology and move on"? Thanks!

110
cyberpunk rule (discuss.tchncs.de)
 
view more: next ›