Max_P

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

AWS does have plenty of VPN solutions for this, but likely not with the credentials you have because they're usually very specific. And it's probably intentional, if they wanted to give you VPN access they'd give you VPN access.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 hours ago

Maybe if he had an actual platform and an actual plan that's not based entirely on undoing what Trudeau did...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

How is that even possible? Dude really thinks the US is the entire world.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago

The website requests an image or whatever from 27748626267848298474.example.com, where the number is unique for the visitor. To load the content the browser has to resolve the DNS for it, and the randomness ensures it won't be cached anywhere as it's just for you. So it queries its DNS server which queries your DNS provider which queries the website's DNS server. From there the website's DNS server can see where the request came from and the website can tell you where it came from and who it's associated with if known.

Yes it absolutely can be used for fingerprinting. Everything can be used for fingerprinting, and we refuse to fix it because "but who thinks of the ad companies???".

[–] [email protected] 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

IBM, in 1979.

This is wide open to send a nuke on allies and blame the AI.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They could also just be spawning Windows VMs directly in AWS, no point doing nested virtualization for something like this. Pretty sure they have a service for doing exactly what you described. No need for a VPN, it can spawn your VM on the right network already (they call it VPC). They can even put real GPUs for AutoCAD and stuff on those things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's going to depend on how the access is set up. It could be set up such that the only way into that network is via that browser thing.

You can always connect to yourself from the Windows machine and tunnel SSH over that, but it's likely you'll hit a firewall or possibly even a TLS MitM box.

Virtual desktops like that are usually used for security, it would be way cheaper and easier to just VPN your workstation in. Everything about this feels like a regulated or certified secure environment like payment processing/bank/government stuff.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but I'm curious if it's hitting the server, then going the router, only to be routed back to the same machine again. 10.0.0.3 is the same machine as 192.168.1.14

No, when you talk to yourself you talk to yourself it doesn't go out over the network. But you can always check using utilities like tracepath, traceroute and mtr. It'll show you the exact path taken.

Technically you could make the 172.18.0.0/16 subnet accessible directly to the VPS over WireGuard and skip the double DNAT on the game server's side but that's about it. The extra DNAT really won't matter at that scale though.

It's possible to do without any connection tracking or NAT, but at the expense of significantly more complicated routing for the containers. I would do that on a busy 10Gbit router or if somehow I really need to public IP of the connecting client to not get mangled. The biggest downside of your setup is, the game server will see every player as coming from 192.168.1.14 or 172.18.0.1. With the subnet routed over WireGuard it would appear to come from VPN IP of the VPS (guessing 10.0.0.2). It's possible to get the real IP forwarded but then the routing needs to be adjusted so that it doesn't go Client -> VPS -> VPN -> Game Server -> Home router -> Client.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Not seeing much, but given the subreddit deletions were attributed to an automated system error and stuff it's not nearly as big of an event as the apicalypse was. The bigger bump I see seems to be linked to the TikTok ban and Pixelfed and Loops climbing to the top of the app store charts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

No idea, never used it, I just happen to know it exists.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You probably want something like Aether instead of the fediverse: https://getaether.net/

It's peer to peer, encrypted, anonymous, ephemeral and all that.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The fediverse is plainly just not appropriate for this. The ActivityPub makes too many assumptions that the data is fully public.

End-to-end encryption: Encrypt all user communications, private messages, and sensitive data

That could work probably, it's a lot of work and will break interoperability but could be done. You'd still have to vet your users very well though, which might contradict the next point. It takes one user to leak everything.

Anonymous accounts: Allow users to create accounts without requiring personally identifiable information (PII), such as email or phone numbers. How can we balance this with the need to combat spam?

There's a fair amount of instances already that will let you sign up with a disposable email

Tor and VPN Integration: Ensure compatibility with privacy tools like Tor, and provide guidance on using VPNs.

A fair chunk of instances already allow VPN/Tor traffic. The bigger ones don't because of spam and CSAM and all that crap, but even Reddit is fully functional over a VPN.

Remove or minimize data collection, including IP addresses, geolocation, and device information. No web server logs.

That'd be very hard to enforce, and the instance owners have to do some collection for the sake of being able to handle lawsuits and pass the blame. But you can protect yourself using a VPN or Tor.

Ephemeral content: auto-deleting posts, messages, etc after a set period.

As an admin, I can literally just restore last month's backup and undelete everything that got deleted. If someone's seen it, you must assume it can at minimum have been screenshot.

Instance chooser that flags which instances are in unsafe countries.

Anyone can get a VPS in just about any country, so you'd have to personally verify the owner which is PII and probably one of the most vulnerable part of the group. You take down the owner you take down the whole thing.

Once again however users have plenty of choices already for that, if you trust your instance's admins.

Defederate from instances in unsafe countries?

Same as previous point. Plus, one can still use the API to fetch the content anyway.

Better opsec around instance owners, admins and moderators

Also pretty hard to enforce.

 

Testing, I broke the database so bad my posts were federating out but not saving on my local instance, fun stuff

 

I can't post at all now?

 

I can't post at all now?

 

Tried some database tweaks

 

Tried some database tweaks

 

Neat little thing I just noticed, might be known but I never head of it before: apparently, a Wayland window can vsync to at least 3 monitors with different refresh rates at the same time.

I have 3 monitors, at 60 Hz, 144 Hz, and 60 Hz from left to right. I was using glxgears to test something, and noticed when I put the window between the monitors, it'll sync to a weird refresh rate of about 193 fps. I stretched it to span all 3 monitors, and it locked at about 243 fps. It seems to oscillate between 242.5 and 243.5 gradually back and forth. So apparently, it's mixing the vsync signals together and ensuring every monitor's got a fresh frame while sharing frames when the vsyncs line up.

I knew Wayland was big on "every frame is perfect", but I didn't expect that to work even across 3 monitors at once! We've come a long, long way in the graphics stack. I expected it to sync to the 144Hz monitor and just tear or hiccup on the other ones.

 

All the protections in software, what an amazing idea!

 

It only shows "view all comments", so you can't see the full context of the comment tree.

 

The current behaviour is correct, as the remote instance is the canonical source, but being able to copy/share a link to your home instance would be nice as well.

Use case: maybe the comment is coming from an instance that is down, or one that you don't necessarily want to link to.

If the user has more than one account, being able to select which would be nice as well, so maybe a submenu or per account or a global setting.

view more: next ›