I'm sort of torn on whether it's a good thing that this is possible.
Like, I don't think it's good for Russia to be able to keep doing what they're doing, but US sanctions are also often used for evil (IMO) so in those cases the existence of methods to evade them could be good.
It'd be nice if the sanctions were only used in good ways in the first place, but that's not currently the reality.
There were a lot of episodes like that in Doctor Who. Basically every season from when I was watching, if I recall correctly. The weeping angels first appeared in one of those, and then because that episode was so popular they shoved them into a bunch of big budget ones after that.
I didn't watch The Game Awards myself, I mostly just know what I've heard about it being more of an industry advertising event rather than a real awards ceremony. And from what I've seen of this year's they aired an obvious AI art trailer and they snubbed ZZZ for the music category, so they're just reinforcing my lack of respect for them.
He probably likes how the US is similar to the Roman Empire in being imperialist.
It's hard to tell which of my memory issues are from ADHD and which are from other neurodivergences.
One of my friends had this take on it:
Die Hard can't be a Christmas movie because Die Hard is actually good.
I'm autistic as well, although I was not diagnosed with it as a kid (they only diagnosed me with a "learning disability" rather than the complicated soup of neurodivergences I have).
I've been lucky to not have to mask much in my life (although I do some, for sure). It's a tragedy that most autistic kids are treated worse than I was. I think they all deserve better.
I'm all in favor of shitting on UHC, but ABA for autism is rather problematic, so they're actually on the same page as the autism community on this one.
EDIT: For those unfamiliar with it, it's basically the autism equivalent of gay conversion therapy, trying to convert autistic children to neurotypical behavior. It's not good for the autistic person's own mental health.
Easy. High taxes on the rich and spend that money to give good universal social programs, and also avert climate catastrophe. The tiny fraction of rich people will disapprove but screw them anyways.
The hard part is getting the political will to do the obvious right thing when politics is controlled by the rich.
NZXT Flex customers have never experienced a pre-tax subscription price increase and will never experience one unless they decide to switch subscription tiers.
I think they're forgetting the part where GN themselves were a NZXT flex customer who experienced subscription price increases. So this statement is already proven to be false before they even said it.
I think the major issue with that idea is that the pain of a government shutdown is not equally felt by Republicans and Democrats. Republicans actively want to disrupt or destroy a lot of the government functions anyways, so they don't really care when all of those things are temporarily shut down. If anything, it gives them what they want.
I said "I don't think it's good for Russia to be able to keep doing what they're doing"
I don't know how you could interpret that as simping for the Russian invasion.
I'm just not going along with the "This helps Russia therefore it is totally bad" knee-jerk. A tool that helps bad people could also help good people. And it probably does, because US sanctions are definitely on the wrong side a lot of the time (although I think they are on the right side regarding Russia's invasion).