Part4

Have children. Flying. Driving. Buying a whole range of carbon intense products blah blah blah.

Vegans just are not credible.

It isn't introvertion.

OP said 'what animal would you be if you were an animal?'

It is insulting to expect everybody to engage in conversation any time some moron expects it.

The respondent, reasonably said 'I'll ask chatgpt' which is a polite way of saying 'I'm not interested in this shite, Bore off, I'm not eight, leave me alone.'

OP then came online to make a big deal about it, claiming the respondent used chatgpt rather than socialising. Which itself is evidence of OP's character and evidence as to why one might not want to engage with the boring **** at work.

Wrong. The only thing there is evidence they did is use chatgpt to deflect a fucking boring conversation.

Now please leave me alone. This is all fucking obvious. I am just blocking any respondents to this message in order to avoid timewasting, thanks.

Edit - oh this is an anti-ai sub. OK, so anything done with ai is automatically bad, you have chosen a side and that is that.

:There is much to dislike about 'ai' technology - primarily its energy use, but the claims of intelligence is also something reasonable to dislike. There is much more to dislike about the people who own 'ai' and the uses they want to put it to, but that is neo-liberal capitalism you should be angry at, not 'ai'. This sub is misguided at best. Block it is.

I know what socialising is, thanks.

I also know that chatgpt can be better than an asinine conversation with people I work with.

'If you were an animal what animal would you be?' is hardly Conan/Dave Letterman level chat fun though, is it?

1. I'd probably choose chatgpt over that kind of conversation with colleagues.

2. Imagine Conan or Dave using 'if you were an animal what animal would you be?' as an opening gambit with a guest.