dont_lemmee_down

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Lindner schmierte der Werferin daraufhin selbst einen Teil des Schaumes zurück in die Haare.

Ermittlung gegen Lidner wegen Körperverletzung und Beleidigung wann?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

WTF do they mean, where is Greenland? It's not like it has moved in the last 1000 years.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

Create a python file that only contains this function

def increase_by_one(i):
    # this increments i
    f=open(__file__).read()
    st=f[28:-92][0]
    return i+f.count(st)

Then you can import this function and it will raise an index error if the comment is not there, coming close to the most literal way

Any code which does not contain the comment "this increments i:" will produce a compile error and fail to run.

could be interpreted in python

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait... Since when is drunk driving so normalized that it is a problem anyone has?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

In der API kann man seine Geschwindigkeit ändern. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere kann man alles zwischen 1 km/h und 40 km/h angeben.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I disagree.

I disagree.

Pronouns are not names.

Yes, that is why I wrote "like". They serve the same functionality.

second

That is the first time you wrote second. That's very telling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well it kinda is. Pronouns are like names, in the sense that we use them to describe to whom we refer.

They are a non injective function on the name set.

The restriction you would like to make is that the function is not multivalued. But it is. As an example, Andrea is a name that is usually associated with a female person, but it is a normal name for male people in Italy.

We allowed people to be named whatever they wanted (or their parents wanted), so why not also let them choose whatever pronoun they prefer?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you're with Dan (they/them) and Dan (he/him), you would also have the problem when saying

"I was with Dan and Dan the other day. Dan hadn't brought the poster, so Dan went back to the car to get it."

So to avoud confusion, people should not be allowed to be called Dan anymore. In fact everyone gets a UUID so there is no more confusion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

We agree. We make he/him obsolete and we're all she/her, as there are more female people on the planet, so less people have to adapt

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Calling people what they ask to be called just doesn't have to be this difficult.

We in fact do it all the time. It's just people have gotten used to using names. But it's not like you were born with a Dave chromosome. Your parents decided to call you Dave, so in the end it's also just a made up name/sound.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Modern supercomputers can do computations that would take a person computing on the fastest abacus 10 septillion years which vastly exceeds the age of the universe, so do we live in a multiverse squared?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

l10n is a bitch. The exceptions are almost as bad as timezones...

The swiss use ' as a separator. So they would write 900'000 which upside down would look like 000,006 so the confusion could continue

view more: next ›