dragonfucker

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Most of the time, language evolution is harmless. Not this time.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The emoji movie. The one that sucks. Upsetting people isn't proof of being correct. If it was, drag would be the wisest person on all of Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fun fact: you can mount a Google drive on your computer and put a swap file in it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

What kind of Nazi sympathist uses Twitter in 2024?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No, you don't understand. By not having a lifeguard, the beach is supporting sharks. We need to choose the evil lifeguard beach to persuade the other beach to get a good lifeguard. If they see how much we prefer evil lifeguard, surely they'll get the message that we actually want good lifeguard

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Nah, they're not feminists, they're just pretending. Trans rights are human rights. All transphobia is sexism.

For example, denying someone's right to be a man, just because he has a vagina... is misogyny. Or at the very least, denying people rights for having a vagina.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The Matrix is a trans allegory, despite the fact that neither of the Wachowskis knew they were trans at that time. They put their feelings of gender confusion, dysphoria, and euphoria into the movie, despite not understanding those feelings. And it made it a masterpiece. That's proof allegory doesn't require intent.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Thank you. If you'd like to judge drag, drag will give you a chance: drag told a cancer patient, who was sure Trump would get him killed, and was suicidal over it, to commit Luigi. Drag said to buy a gun and make his situation a Nazi's problem instead of wallowing and wanting to die. At first he was mad because he felt he was being asked to fight others' battles, but then drag shared what drag has been doing to try and help people like him, and he calmed down. Seemed happier. No more suicidal comments.

Ada removed the comment and said it was promoting suicide. The 196 mods banned drag and said it wasn't promoting suicide, but that it was promoting violence against Nazis and that's not allowed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's morbid

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

.world has come under a lot of fire for being centrist and having anti-violence policies. 196 actually moved from blahaj to world, and most of the users said they wouldn't be going with it, because they don't agree with the aforementioned policies.

13
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

 

Drag knows that being a furry isn't all about sex. It's mostly about liking cartoon animals. But nonetheless, drag did have a preconception of the furry community being a generally sex-positive space due to all the queer floating around. Drag recently had a bizarre experience in which a community of furries was weirdly particular about a certain dirty joke, which had never been a problem in other online communities. Are furries really sex negative compared to most people?

 
6
Cui bono? (Who benefits?) (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Template for anyone who wants to use it:

 

Okay so the title of this post is a joke. But drag means it with a modicum of seriousness.

You see, the argument against this title is "We can't just blame everyone! If we did that, we'd be leaving people zero good options. We have to choose the least bad decision the voters could have made, and support that one."

Drag thinks this is a very sensible argument and agrees with it. We can't just say "screw every option, every action is bad" on principle. That's not productive. We have to choose some least-bad option to support.

Unfortunately, this argument is the same argument in favour of voting for Harris. A lot of people denied this same argument in the previous 6 months. They said no, you can just say "screw every option, every action is bad". They said not to support the least-bad option.

So therefore, drag is quite convinced that these people, for the sake of ideological consistency, ought to be condemning both the Harris voters and the non-voters.

 

Satirical rant incoming:

We all know that transphobic trolls are pretending to be trans in order to make trans people look bad and take away their rights. Therefore, as trans allies, it is our duty to restrict the rights of trans people so that trolls can't use it.

Trans people deserve to identify as whatever gender they so choose. Lately, transphobic trolls have been abusing that right, by pretending to have nonsense genders that make no sense. In order to safeguard our community from trolls and protect the rights of trans people, we must therefore treat any supposedly "trans" person with a nonsense gender with suspicion, in case they're a troll.

Oh, and pronouns? Pronouns are vitally important! Any trans person absolutely deserves to be referred to with whatever pronouns make them feel comfortable. That's why it's essential for us to immediately ban the use of neopronouns, which transphobic trolls have been using to make us realise that we hate neopronoun users.

Remember: We're oppressing trans people because we're allies!

/non-sarcastic: What the hell is up with people who say this kind of thing?

 

Drag was banned from [email protected] a day ago. As you can see, no comments or posts were removed alongside the ban:

In fact, drag has never commented or posted in the community:

Drag has no history of transphobia and no history of trolling. And drag can unequivocably prove that drag was never transphobic or trollish on Ten Forward, because drag has never said anything there. This is a ban for literally, provably, nothing.

 
 

Might as well completely give up on the summary cards from now on

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›