droopy4096

NDP should really go back to Social Democratic roots and double down on them. That is the only thing that can differentiate them from Libs and Cons. Present arrangement granted NDP great leverage, being in minority they were able to push through a lot of great items. Can't hope for this now. They Have To stand out.

great. then we shall ban any conservative think-tanks funded from abroad or by multinationals...

They could've stripped president of immunity and most powers on the way out and complicated process of restoring that... which would be very democratic yet they've failed to do that

They could've "poisoned the well" by locking the status quo and forcing legislation timelines to be 2yr+ so that nothing gets canceled until next midterms muzzling GOP and they could've stripped POTUS of his powers by POTUS submitting an executive order etc... multiple ways to go about it and they did not touch a single one other than "pardons"...

so, with POTUS47 so blatantly (ab)using superpowers granted to him WHY did Biden fail to use even fraction of the same powers to protect the country?

this is called extortion and racketeering... citizens get sentenced for this, POTUSes get to be idolized by electorate...

In Dscover Flatpacks usually show "recommended" on respective selections etc. so I'm confused what's the noise is about. Personally I'm never confused where I'm installing Flatpack from

erm... for them to move to center they have to shift left. Currently they are pretty much righ of the center. They are only to the left of Republicans.

the only place where I a may agree with you is diversifying our trade partners. The rest of "bend over and take it from bully" is a load of horse hockey. Smith is a snake in the grass throwing country under the bus for the sake of oil industry which is largely... foreign owned. So we can and should stand up to bully, not sure whether Lib strategy is any good, but US takes to meddling in our country politics and that's no good at all.

glaring mistakes in facts like lack of comprehension of what Communism is undermine the argument.

For example:

"You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy. Whatever you want you'll rent and it'll be delivered by drone". Isn't that literally how ownership was in the USSR, except without the drones? "

at the very least you're confusing collective ownership when personally you own nothing but collectively you have free access to everything with "renting" communism precludes monetary relationship in general. Now USSR didn't get there but renting was not on the menu either.

this sounds very much like power hungry capitalists whose entire premise is to restrict ownership to "haves" and force rent on "have not's"... there's more but yeah. Not saying Carney is great or worthy but with twisted facts argument is moot.

libertarians calling out POTUS47 on his lunacy, now that is something...

Finally he played up for his best buddy from russia. ICC illegitimacy gets another crook off the hook for crimes against humanity. Their common Israeli friend sire enjoyed that as well... N. Korean buddy probably uncorked his vintage champagne to celebrate the occasion.