frezik

joined 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, setting non-standard ports is sound advice in security circles.

People misunderstand the "no security through obscurity" phrase. If you build security as a chain, where the chain is only as good as the weakest link, then it's bad. But if you build security in layers, like a castle, then it can only help. It's OK for a layer to be weak when there are other layers behind it.

Even better, non-standard ports will make 99% of threats go away. They automate scans that are just looking for anything they can break. If they don't see the open ports, they move on. Won't stop a determined attacker, of course, but that's what other layers are for.

As long as there's real security otherwise (TLS, good passwords, etc), it's fine.

If anyone says "that's a false sense of security", ignore them. They've replaced thinking with a cliche.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All by themselves, weather forecasting satellites justify every dollar put into space programs. The lives saved are incalculable. We are squandering that benefit for no reason whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

It's not the conclusions that are important. It's how snazzy the PowerPoint presentation is. If you pay them more, there will even be bar charts.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

One of my favorite exchanges from the 2008 election:

Colbert: tell me about growing up with a silver spoon in your mouth on the south side of Chicago

Michelle Obama: we didn't have silver spoons. We had four spoons.

Colbert: but there were spoons, right?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The future conservatives want is the same except it's men in fashy uniforms. We don't even have to speculate or joke; it's exactly how mines are run in countries without worker protections.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conservatives don't make that distinction. Though OP does lean into Poe's Law.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Origami can be used as a basis for geometry:

http://origametry.net/omfiles/geoconst.html

IIRC, you can do things that are impossible in standard Euclidean construction, such as squaring the circle. It also has more axioms than Euclidean construction, so maybe it's not a completely fair comparison.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Under true capitalism, everyone starts at 0 regardless of their birth

Then true capitalism will never exist. At best, it's a Platonic Ideal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are ways they can work around it, but their lead developer was drafted into their country's military. Ultimately, they're going to have to make their own phone, and it looks like they're making plans to do that.

For now, it's fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

And they purposely hobbled certain things people want, like inline links and images. Some clients will do it anyway, but it's against the collective wishes of the developers.

If I wanted to track people on Gemini, I could totally do it. It'd just be in a more server-to-server way than how its evolved on HTTP (pixel trackers and such).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Some people haven't lived through the time when HTML layout was done through nested tables, and it shows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe we could have No-JS and No-Client-Storage (which would include cookies) headers added to HTTP. Browsers could potentially display an icon showing this to users on the address bar.

Theoretically, browsers could even stop from the JS engine from being started for the site in the first place. Though I wouldn't be surprised if the engine is too tied into the code of modern browsers for that to work.

view more: ‹ prev next ›