Good. Very good.
hperrin
joined 5 months ago
They’re super small, so either behind the ears or obscured by the fur.
Here’s a picture of one from a different angle. You can see how small the eyes are.
I thought they were exclusive fruit eaters.
Cue, to actually answer your question.
notices bulge what’s this?
Ah yes, cosmetic features like… a grenade launcher.
Yeah, I was being sarcastic to show how ridiculous that logic is.
I’ll tell you that as soon as you tell me where else we ignore 50% of a law. ;)
Here’s a study on gun ownership vs gun deaths:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3828709/
Results. Gun ownership was a significant predictor of firearm homicide rates (incidence rate ratio = 1.009; 95% confidence interval = 1.004, 1.014). This model indicated that for each percentage point increase in gun ownership, the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9%.
Conclusions. We observed a robust correlation between higher levels of gun ownership and higher firearm homicide rates. Although we could not determine causation, we found that states with higher rates of gun ownership had disproportionately large numbers of deaths from firearm-related homicides.
Here’s a graphic showing gun ownership by country:
https://www.graphicnews.com/en/pages/42747/firearms-civilian-gun-ownership-by-country
As you can see, the US is almost 4 times higher than the next highest country.
And here’s a graphic showing the number of mass shootings by country:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/mass-shootings-by-country
Again, you can see that the US tops the chart by a huge margin (more than 5 times).
We can’t really compare based on just violence alone, because any country in active conflict severely skews the data. You’d have to include only countries in peacetime. But you can certainly compare based on gun violence, because the US always trends very high. Even when you include countries in active conflict, the US compares to them in gun violence. So, living in the US is similar to living in a country involved in active conflict with regard to gun violence.
Highlights
- Globally, the U.S. ranks at the 93rd percentile for overall firearm mortality, 92nd percentile for children and teens, and 96th percentile for women.
- The U.S. has among the highest overall firearm mortality rates, as well as among the highest firearm mortality rates for children, adolescents, and women, both globally and among high-income countries.
- Nearly all U.S. states have a higher firearm mortality rate than most other countries. Death rates due to physical violence by firearm in U.S. states are closer to rates seen in countriesexperiencing active conflict.
- Black and American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) people have the highest firearm mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group.
What you’re asking for doesn’t exist, wasn’t called for in the law, and is an unreasonable demand.
Similar enough laws have been studied and shown to be effective, as pointed out in the article I provided. Demanding that a specific law be researched regardless of existing research of similar laws is unreasonable.
Again, if you’re actually worried about this kind of research, you should be petitioning the federal government to make it easier to perform scientific research on gun violence.
view more: next ›
That is a diver’s suit, not a SCUBA suit. SCUBA stands for “self contained underwater breathing apparatus”, and the self contained part was the big benefit over a diver’s suit like the one pictured. It doesn’t need a support ship to supply air to the diver, since the air supply is self contained.