Also, that shop that sells completely random stuff (chandeliers, dolls, weird statues, horrible carpets and so much more junk), never seen it open but have been there for like at least 30 years.
We had one of those. It turns out it was owned by a rental agent, and he just used it to store the random stuff he'd use to furnish appartments with to rent out.
I couldn't agree more. Occasionally I'll use an appimage where something is not packaged for my distro version and I only need it temporarily.
Maybe I'm just long in the tooth, but linux used to be a simple, quite elegant system, with different distros providing different focuses, whether they were trying to be windows clones, something that a business could bank on being there in ten years, or something for those who like to tinker. The common theme throughout was 'the unix way', each individual tool was simple, did one job, and did it well. Now we seem to be moving to a much more homogenous ecosystem of distros with tooling that tries to be everything all at once, and often, not very well.
There's nothing on that page that says the speed limit is the 85% percentile of the traffic flow. It states quite clearly that 'Statutory speed limits are established by State legislatures for specific types of roads (e.g., Interstates, rural highways, urban streets) and can vary from State to State. They are enforceable by law and are applicable even if the speed limit sign is not posted' and 'Posted speed limits (sometimes called regulatory speed limits) are those that are sign-posted along the road and are enforceable by law.'
Those speed limits are initially set based on the design speed of the road, then later they can be assessed and possibly modified based on a number of factors including the 85% percentile you referenced, however' 'The 85th percentile speed is not the only factor practitioners evaluate when determining an appropriate speed limit; they complete engineering speed studies and often utilize supporting tools like USLIMITS2.'
Critically though, none of this means you can just drive at the prevailing speed of the traffic if it's above the statutory or posted limit and not be considered to be speeding. The 85% percentile may be used to set the speed limit, but when it's set, it's the law.
100 myths. Perfect.
Oh God, is everyone looking at me weird when I drink soda wrong?
If you're not holding it in the crook of your elbow, lifting your arm, and pouring it onto your outstretched tongue, then at least one of us is doing it wrong, and I think it's you, and everyone is silently judging you for your weird way of drinking. They don't drink with their elbows probably because they don't want to embarass you.
Perfect, he gets to make a big fuss for the racists, but doesn't actually have to change anything. That way there's less risk of breaking anything, and he's probably looking for a win right now.
It's a bit like decreeing that all English week day names must henceforth end in the letter 'y'. It's low risk, makes certain people think you're busy taking action, and leaves everyone else wondering what you're up to with this, taking some of the heat off of other issues.
I'm not going to say that sort of thing doesn't happen, they undoubtedly do, but in places where the rules don't permit speeding, just because everyone else is, the problem self corrects. If too many motorists exceed the limit, the police have a field day ticketing as many as they can, and the situation reverts to people driving at the limit.
That does take setting the limits appropriately, constant enforecement that can be scaled up, a certain margin of error being accepted so everyone doesn't have their eyes glued to the speedo, and the understanding and acceptance from motorists that the rules are fair and there for a reason. Absent any one or more of those, and things will inevitably turn into a racetrack again. Fortunately, much of the management and enforcement is usually local, so political pressure applied locally can often help correct issues.
Hey, I didn't get banned (yet), I just prefer the vibe here.
This is an interesting prompt. Critically it seems like you definitely aren't omnipotent, so whilst you can try to influence and teach the new inhabitants, there's nothing stopping them simply ignoring you and doing something else.
Rather than some wanting to just not contribute, I'd be more concerned by a group deciding to focus their efforts on building weapons and simply taking what they want from others.
Fully automated luxury gay space communism is certainly an ideal, but it is extremely vulnerable to hostile forces until it gets large enough and willing enough to excert eqivalent force in return. Hostile forces can be military, ideological, or resource limit based. Responding to all of those, is a massive challenge.
I knew there was such a thing as slicing your shot in golf, I didn't know it meant that!
It'd be pretty trivial to do the same here, 1700 or so comments over 'several months', is less than 25 a day. No need even for bot posting, have the LLM ingest the feed, spit out the posts and have the intern make accounts and post them.
The issue is that they're doing what they can to make those orders legal. They're not there yet, they'll hopefully hit plenty of resistance before they get there, and they're not exactly renowned for being competent, but they're working on it.