If you're a writer and have to turn to the make-things-up-machine to make things up, why are you even a writer in the first place?
People who have a favourite pencil.
Firstly, the Prime Minister and an MP are very different, so it's not really a fair comparison. Replacing an MP with one of the same party might result in what? Your bins being taken out on a different day?
Anyway, I think this is a "don't let perfect be the enemy of good situation". Without any safeguards, an assassination is most likely to come from someone across the political spectrum than someone next to them. So it makes sense to focus on preventing that even if it does open a potential (risky to execute) exploit.
... Isn't wanting to kill someone with vastly different views more common than wanting to kill someone with only slightly different views?
Like, sure someone could kill someone in the party they like for the chance to get someone they like better in power. But realistically it won't change much (they're still bound by the same whip) and it's not worth the risk of going to jail.
Skipped to the "ugly" part of the article and I kind of agree with the language being hard?
I think a bigger problem is that it's hard to find "best practices" because information is just scattered everywhere and search engines are terrible.
Like, the language itself is fairly simple and the tutorial is good. But it's a struggle when it comes to doing things like "how do I change the source of a package", "how do I compose two modules together" and "how do I add a repo to a flake so it's visible in my config". Most of this information comes from random discourse threads where the responder assumes you have a working knowledge of the part of the codebase they're taking about.
Tried the demo of this when it first came out and honestly wasn't a fan.
The demo was very short and didn't have any difficult puzzles. I get that it's just a demo, but I wanted to see a taste for how far the mechanics could go.
I also really didn't click with the story, which was most of the demo's runtime. I assume that some people will be interested in the story, but personally I'm not interested in a minute of gameplay being broken up by 5 minutes of watching a guy trying to figure out how Japan works.
Shenzen I/O had a similar theme, but approaches it with a "less is more" philosophy; portraying character personality and interactions in a few lines of text.
Presumably because the "AI" that these people are working on is different from what's being shoved down our throat by aibros.
Stuff like folding proteins or whatever it is they do all day.
Foxes can eat fish, so I guess the scent is similar enough?
Hmm? Sorry, did you say something?
This seems a bit of a risky move... Lets see if this gamble pays off.
If you can provide evidence for what really happened, I'll happily take a look.
And yes, my language was harsh, and I apologise for that. I've just seen people making up drama to discredit communities before, and it gets on my nerves somewhat.
I've seen people suggesting and using Anubis, haven't used it myself though.