silasmariner

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

At least come up with a fancy word for it like Wombleypoos or something

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

takes a big swig of Cantor depends if you're talking ordinals or cardinals, my dude. Let's get heavy with infinities my man.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Your definition of practical and mine differ. For me, a path that makes my life considerably worse is not a practical path. I would assume the same is true for you, you're just unable to admit it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I think they meant, like, practical actionable paths, not like 'I'm playing a Sim and everyone does what I say'. Perhaps they were trying to think about what people could do in the real world that we actually live in

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Look, you can have nuance or you can have performative outrage, you don't get to have both. Lemmy has made its bed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Alas, doesn't fit my purpose since it requires action by the script user. I usually just use perl in those situations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Lotta potential positions you could take with regards to that system, y'know. cracks epistemological knuckles, what ya got? How do you decide how much weight to attribute to a fact you heard someone else tell you? Who? In what context? That stuff doesn't, I believe, have a pithy answer

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Should've been a path there to begin with, clearly. Bad design

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I never saw such a potent combination of gender politics and prolog

view more: ‹ prev next ›