Lemmy.ca

geteilt von: https://sopuli.xyz/post/30559186

Paywalls blocked: https://archive.is/2025.07.17-182607/https://www.theverge.com/news/709209/news-media-alliance-12ft-io-takedown-paywall

From their newsletter:

We’re excited to share that the Greater Vancouver Food Bank was recently featured in Edible Magazine for our work to reduce food waste and preserve fresh, locally grown food.

We’re featured on pages 30 to 34. You can read the full article here or by clicking the button below.

Thanks to your continued support, we have partnered with 19 farms across BC and introduced new preservation techniques such as freeze drying and dehydrating. These efforts are allowing us to save more food and get it to the people who need it most.

This year alone, we’ve seen an 836% increase in fresh food rescued — healthy food that might have otherwise gone to waste, now nourishing 15,000 individuals and supporting 150 community agency partners every month.

Whether you are pitching a market expansion, proposing a strategic acquisition, or advocating for a major technology investment, you often face objections. The stakeholders might say the timing is wrong, the risk is too high, or the resources should be allocated elsewhere. Whenever you must bring someone over to your point of view, you are likely to get pushback and objections. Learning to deal with objections is a key negotiation skill and one that every business owner or executive must master.

While objections might raise different concerns, they generally take one of three forms:

“Yes, but…,” such as “Yes, but we already have a strategy that works fine.” 
“What if… ?” as in “What if we adopt this strategy and it doesn’t work?”  
“Why should we… ?” For example, “Why should we make this change now, just as people are recovering from recent layoffs?” “Why should we restructure our leadership reporting now, just as we’re stabilizing after the recent acquisition?” 

To bring your reader or listener over to your side, you must be prepared to deal with these objections—and any others that come your way.
Put yourself in the other person’s position

Imagine you were opposing your own proposal. What objections would you have? Consider what you know about your audience: What are their likely concerns? What are their questions? What form are their objections likely to take? The following responses that can help.

1. Acknowledge the person’s objection

You might say, “I hear that you’re concerned about the regulatory requirements of this proposal and how this might affect our relationship with investors.” Then, restate the objection to be sure you truly grasp their meaning.

You could say, “Let me be sure I understand. You’re saying that moving forward with this proposal could trigger regulatory scrutiny that might complicate our other priorities and potentially concern our key investors. Is that correct?” or “If I understand you, you’re worried this could create compliance risks that outweigh the strategic benefits. Did I get that right?”

If the prospect says no, ask for clarification before moving on. This step reassures the other person that you are genuinely listening and that you respect their perspective.

2. Respond to the objections thoughtfully

Respond effectively by demonstrating the benefits of your proposal and describing the costs of not acting. For example, in the board of directors’ case, you could point out that your current strategy does not consider the impact of artificial intelligence on your operations, while the proposed strategy seamlessly integrates AI into the organization. You might also point out that other organizations have successfully implemented similar strategies.

Your description of costs and benefits should focus more on the value of your proposal than the cost. When you clearly convey value, cost becomes less significant.

3. Collaborate to find a solution that feels manageable and worthwhile for everyone

Rather than pushing your position, invite others to share their ideas for addressing the issue. Work together toward an approach that satisfies both sides.

For example, you might establish a phased implementation with designated oversight checkpoints or form a steering committee to oversee the rollout. You could provide data-backed risk assessments, detail contingency plans, and show how the proposal aligns with long-term vision and goals.

For organizational changes, you can offer to hold company-wide meetings where you explain how the prospective change aligns with the company vision, enabling everyone to voice their concerns. Whatever solution you arrive at should feel like a win-win. You should feel heard, and the other party should become an active collaborator in solving the problem.

When you follow these three steps—acknowledge, respond, and collaborate—you will find it easier to respond empathetically and confidently to even the thorniest objections, especially in times when resources are tight, and decisions carry more weight. Please try this method and let me know how it works for you. You can reach me at [email protected] if you’d like to share any examples or have questions.

Le parti propose d’instaurer une taxe foncière progressive « sur les propriétés unifamiliales de luxe au-delà de 3,5 millions de dollars. Les sommes récoltées seront entièrement consacrées à la lutte contre l’itinérance à Montréal »

Dubvee went offline before we could decide and move the community which just has been moved to Dubvee not more than three weeks ago. Therefor we couldn't announce where we move to which I'd like therefore to do with this post.

The new community is: [email protected]

Background:

1. https://piefed.jeena.net/post/204063
2. https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/49080279
3. https://piefed.jeena.net/post/205297

geteilt von: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/500313

Comments

I know, I know, I'm posting this on a community dedicated to Helldivers 2, statistically the answer I would get just from the title is "yes".

Circlejerk aside, I can't think of any other live service game that is a fair comparison.
The closest one I can think of is Deep Rock Galactic, which (ATTOW) I've played for 1.2k hours, compared to HD2 (1.001k).
But then, even though I think DRG is a qualitatively equal game AND technically also a live service game, if we're simply judging the live–serviceness(?) of either game, HD2 comes out on top: I bought the game way after the Malevelon Creek plotline, and even though I was late to the party, it still feels like shit keeps happening every month or two, while I haven't played DRG in 2 years and AFAIK it's still... there (mad respect though, rock solid game).

The other three LS games I've ever played for significant time spans are Team Fortress 2 (1270h), Destiny 2 ^(holy^ ^shit^ ^so^ ^many^ ^2s)^ (170h) and Sea Of Thieves (160h (I've got a friend with >3k h? wtf?)).

TF2 is... I mean, it probably holds up, idk I haven't played it in 6 years or more but I'd hardly consider it an ongoing game (PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong);
Destiny 2 is, as far as I know, the most relevant AAA comparison with a reasonably strong season–spanning story and MEH, my brother gifted it to me (two seasons, in fact) and they both felt like a chore to keep up with;
Sea Of Thieves is... have you played it? It's jankier than the Spear was 6 months ago.
I never even considered playing Marvel Rivals, a currently popular game, but...

HD2, on the other hand, ~~never misses the mark~~ misses the mark quite often but in a funny or spectacular way.
Maybe it's just me playing every other evening and having warbonds and events not too hard to keep up with, with eventual SC farming every now and then, but off the top of my head I've been through:

• The appearance of the Jet Brigade (at the time I just thought jetpack commissars were simply regular enemies (maybe they were idk));
• The gloom;
• The DSS construction;
• The DSS perpetual 380 (underrated af idgaf fite me 1v1 Rust snipers only);
• Meridia ~~(I was born there in 2117, honestly I'm excited to get back home and hug my wife)~~;
• New fire warbond (where they nerfed fire? wtf?);
• New warbond;
• New warbond;
• ~~The predator strain actually nvm I genuinely refuse to ever play against them, not fun, gg bb, these guys are bullshit~~
• HOLY SHIT A COMPLETELY NEW FACTION ATTACKED OUR PLANETS THIS IS ABSOLUTELY UNEXPECTED AND I MUST UPDATE&BOOT THE GAME IMMEDIATELY ~~(I looked up the first game's lore beforehand and I knew 100% this was going to happen, but still)~~, also new warbond;
• New warbond (idgaf I'm bringing the One True Flag on a Super Helldive and you ARE going to put up with me);
• Flame brigade (idr when they were born but I loved them)
• ... Super Earth? Seriously, I honestly did not see this coming, maybe I should have, but I didn't.
• New warbond;
• New warbTHAT IS A FUCKING HALO: CURSED EDITION BLUNDERBUSSond;
• The steam rewiew bomb cape
  • The Steam review bomb cape
    • The Steam review bomb cape
• Xbox recruits (finally my brother and I can play together with something that isn't Sea Of Thieves or Destiny 2)

... and we're still going.

The point is, in an age when the pre–StopKillingGames videogame industry defines "live service" game as a non–government owned legal money printing machine, to me Helldivers 2 is the only working example of an actual living game, and... a bit of a miracle.
A Sony funded live service gold rush miracle, but hey, even God™ got gotta earn that bread.

... relevant to the last paragraph: EU citizens, go sign the SKG petition right now. Super Earth demands it.

We talked with the designer behind games such as The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, A Mind Forever Voyaging and Leather Goddesses of Phobos.

I fell down this wormhole while I was home sick a few months ago. Pretty incredible to see footage of these search-and-rescue operations.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/48149647

Do you know what the first commercial game for home computers was? Much has been said about the first arcade and console games, but when we turn to the realm of computers, information becomes far less accessible. What is commonly known is that in 1977, three computers were launched: the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET. Together, these are often called the «trinity of 1977», and they revolutionized the market by making computers something anyone could own and use.

From VA Marine Mammal Rescue Society via this RSS feed

Paywall bypass: https://archive.today/CqMkl

[...]

Those include a new 25 per cent tariff on all steel products that contain metal melted and poured in China by the end of the month.

Canada will also impose import quotas based on how much steel was imported from each country in 2024, with countries that don't have a free-trade agreement with Canada already in place impacted more than those that do.

Imports that exceed these quotas will be charged a 50 per cent tariff rate.

Carney said Canada's steel industry will be among the most impacted by the ongoing global rearrangement of markets because it is one of the most open in the world for steel and the industry must be protected.

"Imports supply almost two-thirds of current Canadian consumption of steel, compared to less than one-third for the United States and less than one-sixth for the European Union," Carney said.

[...]

The prime minister said Canada must rely more on "Canadian steel, for Canadian projects."

[...]