this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
35 points (76.9% liked)

AskUSA

379 readers
12 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. [email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. [email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. [email protected]

Related communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. [email protected]

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/7570120

Title. It seems like the police just chose a random person to have someone to prosecute.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

How does "it" work, exactly? Should I work under the assumption that everyone who is accused of a crime is innocent?

Why lie about it? You really think with the infinite resources available to the gov that they couldn't figure out who shot a CEO on a busy NYC street in broad daylight?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You really think with the infinite resources available to the gov that they couldn’t figure out who shot a CEO on a busy NYC street in broad daylight?

You really think that the infinite (human) resources in the gov care about putting the effort to find the actual shooter, when they can just manipulate all media and make the scapegoat feel real?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Again, I ask:

Why lie about it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

When you have a hammer in hand, everything looks like a nail.

When selling a lie is the skill an org has put the most XP in, that's what they seek to do first.

Also, I see some group of competitors finding out that the guy had some plan to get on top and decided to off him first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When you have a hammer in hand, everything looks like a nail.

I don't think you understand this analogy. There is a nail. You're suggesting they're driving the nail into the wrong board on purpose for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Let's go by: Because they didn't learn to use a screw driver properly, they went with the hammer.

Also, alternatively, if the "competitor's job" assumption is correct, then of course they want to keep the actual actors out of the investigation and away from media.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Should I work under the assumption that everyone who is accused of a crime is innocent?

Innocent until proven guilty is what the law is SUPPOSED to do. I personally think he did it, but shouldn't be punished.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No one asked about the law. They asked what I believe.