this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
400 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

68918 readers
4615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 month ago (10 children)

On the one hand, fostering local production of these goods is positive for national resilience, and also has a chance to reduce shipping around the world, which is bad for the environment.

On the other hand, good fucking luck, lol.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 month ago (9 children)

No way we're making chips stateside with the Department of Education on the chopping block.

So many schools will close and you sure as shit ain't training people who can make top of the line chips with no fucking schools.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They plan to import workers with visas and then hold those visas over their heads to force them to work for peanuts.

I mean, they do this small-scale already.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

As the standard of living and pay in the USA quickly tanks and becomes less desirable than where they're from, those people will stop applying for those positions.

They can't force foreigners to sign up for H-1B visas. The whole point is the salary is currently and the USA is currently a desirable place to live. Won't stay that way long. They're literally tearing down all the things that made it desirable to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone commented here yesterday that just as NAFTA allowed manufacturers to export jobs and find reasoning to squeeze blue collar workers, creating a general shift to white-collar work in the U.S., this move is designed to squeeze those higher paying white-collar jobs, so that even more money goes into corporate and investor coffers.
My own addition to that thought is that it seems the natural end product is that the only way to make money once that system has done it’s evil deeds is to have money and be a member of the investor class.

Or, in other words - they aim to do to all of the U.S. what Walmart did to small towns across the U.S.

Without a care in the world, obviously. I think the people wealthy enough to not be impacted by this will thrive on exploitation until the U.S. economy is sucked dry to the point of unsustainability for their grift (or revolution occurs), then, like the parasites they are, will take their grotesque wealth and move onto other economies they can exploit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been saying this for years now. The wealthy here are now international wealthy. They don't care about borders. Musk hops his private jet and goes wherever the fuck he wants whenever he wants and no governments seem to be in his way.

They are done with the high standard of living in the US. They think we're coddled and don't deserve it. They're done trying to bring up international living standards to match America and are all-in on bringing American living standards down to match the rest of the planet.

This is the strip-mining stage of American capitalism. They've turned all the economic tools that they used to subjugate South America (Chile for example), using Milton Friedman's Economic Shock Treatment here at home in the US.

They really don't give a damn, they're done with us. We're being dropped like a jilted lover.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would anyone want to come over here right now? I don’t even want to be here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of immigrants are paid more highly in the US than they are in their home countries.

The Indian Rupee, for example, has a poor exchange rate with the US dollar and they have higher salaries in the US.

So they take an H-1B job and they make enough to take care of themselves in the US and usually have US dollars they can send home to their family which can be exchanged for large amounts of rupees.

Current exchange is rougly $1 USD to about ₹80 rupees.

This will change as the US economy tanks and people stop using the US dollar as a reserve currency.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Especially as foreigners learn how much we seem to want to exploit them. Whether in agriculture, housekeeping, or nuclear physics, the common denominator is taking advantage of foreigners who we constantly profess our hatred for.

[–] PerogiBoi 7 points 1 month ago

That’s how Twitter is run

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The factory TSMC opened in the USA was mostly staffed with workers from Taiwan, because Americans won't work 996.

It also only makes dies (the functional part of the IC), that still have to be exported to Taiwan for packaging.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do they have 996 in Taiwan? I thought that was just the PRC?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Japan, Korea, Taiwan and China are not all of Asia. All of East Asia perhaps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

correct that's what I meant to say thank you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

India does too. Not sure about the rest of Asia.

[–] hddsx 3 points 1 month ago

996? PRC?

You mean 007?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Freedom fries.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When a quarter of the most qualified engineers to make the stuff and a lot of the cheap manual labor are immigrants and you do a campaign against immigrants so they leave, maybe you don't have enough people left to to create local production.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

That's covered in "lol"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Illegal immigrants went to America because their home countries are fucking miserable. They're not going back because they don't feel welcome. And they're definitely not engineers, much less the "most qualified" engineers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I said immigrants, not illegal immigrants. But in the end, legal immigrants get deported too.

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/foreign-born-stem-workers-united-states

As of 2019, immigrants made up almost one-fourth, or 23.1 percent, of all STEM workers in the entire country.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/01/politics/migrants-legal-status-trump-biden/index.html

The Trump administration is preparing to revoke legal status for many migrants who entered the United States under a Biden-era program, according to a source familiar with the planning, expanding the pool of people who could be deported.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

legal immigrants get deported

You have evidence of this?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A search turns up some hits legal migrants are put in detention centers. But you can also wait a few weeks and evidence should be on the news.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the classic "look into it" argument. When evidence finds itself in the news I will consider this a threat. Until then, your claims are unfounded.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Physically removed Americans from the United States

A number of Americans have been placed in immigration detention centers to be deported but were later released.[15][16] Up to one percent of all those detained in immigration detention centers are nationals of the United States according to research by Jacqueline Stevens, a professor of political science at Northwestern University.[21]

The following is an incomplete list of Americans who have actually experienced deportation from the United States:

Pedro Guzman, born in the State of California, was forcefully removed to Mexico in 2007 but returned several months later by crossing the Mexico–United States border. He was finally compensated in 2010 by receiving $350,000 from the government.[22] Mark Daniel Lyttle, born in the State of North Carolina, was forcefully removed to Mexico but later returned to the United States from Guatemala and filed a damages lawsuit in federal court,[13] which he ultimately won.[2] Andres Robles Gonzalez derived U.S. citizenship through his U.S. citizen father before being forcefully removed to Mexico. He was returned to the United States and filed a damages lawsuit in federal court, which he ultimately won.[3][23] Roberto Dominquez was born in Lawrence, Massachusetts. He was deported to the Dominican Republic. The government is unconvinced in this case as it claims that there are two people by the same name, both born during the same month and year. According to the government, both children were born to parents with the same addresses, and that one child was born in Santo Domingo, the capital of the Dominican Republic.[24] Esteban Tiznado-Reyna was born in Mexico to a father who had an Arizona birth certificate, which was found unreliable in an immigration court.[25] Tiznado was found not guilty of illegal reentry into the United States in 2008, but ICE still deported him despite the verdict. Documents were uncovered that the USCIS withheld in the 1980s, showing his proof of citizenship.[24]

https://immigrationimpact.com/2021/07/30/ice-deport-us-citizens/

and this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_Americans_from_the_United_States

I want to point out that this list is INCOMPLETE and you should go to the bottom of the Wikipedia page you will see numerous articles depicting the stories of the people above.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We don't manufacture cars in the United States we assemble them. Most of the parts for cars are made outside of the states. Mainly in China.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

No country manufactures cars 100% locally. We live in a global economy. All cars are made from components sourced from countries all over the world, in varying degrees.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that's the goal, you announce tariffs are coming in a few years so that people scale up local production to avoid the higher costs.

In this case, there was like 4 months notice where all of it was undefined, so of course nobody did anything and now we still don't have local production. Now, prices will go up and local producers (if they even build up) will match the new prices instead of keeping them low.

Congrats, worst of both worlds! We still have no local production and prices have gone up! Yay!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even then, as a democracy, you can only do really mild tariffs as companies won't trust the tariffs to stay high come the next government. You instead subsidise, in whatever form, including things like long-term supply contracts. If you want to push domestic ball point pen production, just order your administration to prefer buying domestic ball point pens if they're within what 20% of the import price, then slowly reduce that rate but keep the preference to make sure your ballpoint pen industry is productive, efficient, and competitive. Make it a 10-year supply contracts the next government can't just cancel. If you're the US, give them to teachers to give children.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Shipping over water is actually pretty green, since they have huge ships carrying a bunch of containers with relatively little energy.

Building new factories in the States will create a lot more pollution. Concrete is the opposite of green.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yet he supports oil.. Which accounts for a sizeable share of international shipping. This is while the US doesn't have enough refining capacity for the type of oil we produce.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree, tariffs will be a net positive for the country. Problem is, the people taking the brunt of that impact will, as always, be the poorest and most vulnerable. There are many ways we could solve that problem but of course authoritarians have no interest in that.

That being said, anyone who voted for Trump thinking he would fix the economy is a fucking moron. Tariffs make shit worse before they get better. It will probably be a decade before we start to see any positive impact from them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tariffs are a net negative. Always. The things produced will not be competitive on the global market, if they were, we'd already be making them. The higher prices always destroy more jobs than they create. Retaliatory tariffs destroy even more jobs. The higher prices drive down demand and make the working class consumer poorer. Always.

There's no economic upside to tariffs, over any time horizon. They create a small number of jobs in a specific sector at a very expensive cost. Some politicians might decide that the enormous economic cost is worth it for other reasons, but a net positive they are not.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has a whole list of citations on this very sentence lol.

There is near unanimous consensus among economists that tariffs are self-defeating and have a negative effect on economic growth and economic welfare

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh well, you have a single sentence from a Wikipedia article, I guess I was wrong!

The citations are all concerning the concept of "free trade" which is an incredibly generic phrase.

load more comments (3 replies)