hddsx

joined 2 years ago
[–] hddsx 61 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Custom: 0% HAHAFUCKYOU

[–] hddsx 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s pilot error or deviation. You have the CRJ in sight. You are responsible for maintaining visual separation. Full stop. Instrument failure does not apply to your eyes.

[–] hddsx 5 points 19 hours ago

You right. Helicopters aren’t terrain. My bad

[–] hddsx 32 points 19 hours ago (14 children)

….

PAT25(?) announced that they have a visual on the CRJ. ATC instructed them to maintain visual separation and then proceed behind the CRJ. They didn’t. No maydays, no panpans.

It’s pilot deviation or pilot error.

What would you be interested in with the black box? If the TAWS warned the CRJ pilots?

[–] hddsx 1 points 21 hours ago

I was thinking more like a certain a super Mario brother

[–] hddsx 2 points 23 hours ago

Fair, but as apolitical as possible, I find it hard to believe that any escorts wouldn’t take out the drone if POTUS is on board. Regardless of who that may be

[–] hddsx -3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Like I said in another comment, you can end the fascist line without innocent lives if you are going to rewind history.

And the author of the time line should probably put Die Fuhrer Musk into the mix.

[–] hddsx 3 points 1 day ago

There are ways to discontinue the fascist line without needing to sacrifice so many other lives.

And fuck Trump.

[–] hddsx 6 points 1 day ago

Check out VAS aviation on YouTube

[–] hddsx 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

This was pilot deviation or pilot error for the helicopter. They were instructed to maintain visual separation and to cross behind the CRJ and then just didn’t.

Edit: The issue was also that they reported CRJ in sight. If they couldn’t find the CRJ, ATC should have routed them on a safe path. But they reported in sight.

 

I last played FIFA 20111 or 2013. Moving on to FC25, I feel like the offside rules has significantly changed (or they added the video monitoring thing into the game)

Can someone help me clarify offsides rules? I was under the impression that offsides is when the ball is in front of the second to last defender, at the point of contact with the ball, no legal playable part of the body may be past the second to last defender.

However, I swear in FC25, I’ve gotten an offsides after the keeper touches it but doesn’t hold on to it, and I pass to someone else past the second defender.

That, and I swear I’ve gotten an offsides for having a hand or part of an arm past the last defender.

 

Is there a friendly alternative to VMWare/Virtualbox? I would move back to Virtualbox, but it's now owned by oracle

 

I am not affiliated, just like music from both sides

21
I like cars but… (self.fuckcars)
submitted 1 year ago by hddsx to c/fuckcars
 

I can’t help but think that cars (EV included) just aren’t the answer. I feel like bikes aren’t the answer either. I feel like the metro and high speed rail are.

Most people don’t drive because they like driving (US), most people drive because they have to. And that sucks. You shouldn’t feel like you’re forced to drive. Because that’s auto insurance and auto registration that you have to pay.

You can’t eliminate roads altogether. You need at least one or two lanes for fire trucks, ambulances, garbage trucks, etc. but you can create pockets of no car zones.

People like me who like cars, should be able to have places we store our cars. We should have places where we can explore the limits of our cars instead of driving through traffic. But that should be a strictly extracurricular activity.

In the no car pockets, you should be able to walk to a grocery store, hardware store, that has what you need. You should be able to have mixed zoning. Single family units shouldn’t be the norm. If I own a car but it’s not my dedicated form of transportation, I can buy a cooler car and I don’t need a garage next to where I live to store it. I can store it outside no car pockets so that I can take public transport to my car and then take my car to the track.

Yes, it’ll take awhile to get there but why aren’t we doing more to that end? Am I too idealistic?

 

…. I have no interest in yiffit.net

 

I’ve seen:

  • .ml
  • .social
  • .world
  • .cuz

Is it due to cheaper registration and/or renewal fees? Or are there simply more availability on those TLDs?

 

I have accidentally upvoted two things that I did not intend. I don’t intend to ever swipe to upvote - but I would like to swipe to go back. Is there anyway to make the swipe to upvote a choice?

view more: next ›