this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8096 readers
1390 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] imvii 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope. Time for Singh to kick rocks.

If the party suffers under your leadership, you are not right for the party.

[โ€“] jerkface 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The metric for the NDP isn't how many seats they get, because they're never going to get into power. Its how much influence they are able to apply to the government. By that metric, the NDP have been doing well.

[โ€“] corsicanguppy 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By that metric, the NDP have been doing well.

Except the sabre-rattling that could let Milhouse into power and damn the country. Aside from that, it was good. When Jagmeet had the screws to Justin and was getting things people needed, that was a good thing that the power play killed.

I don't think we'll get that back, even under Mark, and that'll be the lasting damage here.

[โ€“] jerkface 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The government was going to fall if Trudeau didn't retire. With that context, it didn't really cost our country anything, and it allowed the NDP to demonstrate to the next government that they have agency and the will to use it.