this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
397 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

8126 readers
1659 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This Black History Month, it’s important to recognize that economic injustice—both in Canada and around the world—is deeply rooted in racism. The property system in Canada was founded on the forced displacement and exclusion of Indigenous peoples from their land and immigration policies that prevented non-white immigration, effectively barring many thousands of people from accessing property in Canada. These racialized colonial systems laid the foundation for the current racial wealth gap, where racialized Canadians have about half as much wealth as their non-racialized counterparts.

Unlike the United States, where constitutional barriers have historically shielded the ultra-rich from direct taxation, Canada faces no such constitutional legal obstacles—only political ones. And those political excuses are running out.

A wealth tax enjoys overwhelming public support. Nearly 90 percent of Canadians back it, yet successive Liberal and Conservative governments have refused to act. Their refusal isn’t due to legal constraints but to the immense influence of corporate lobbyists and billionaire donors who oppose any effort to make them pay their fair share.

Just last year, powerful corporate interests mobilized to kill a progressive tax measure that would have primarily targeted Canada’s wealthiest citizens and corporations: the partial closure of the capital gains loophole.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theacharnian 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Gary Stevenson explained it, so long as inequality grows, the rest of us will be struggling more and more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Capitalism does not inherently specify that 5 fat old cucks should own everything.

The system created by the rich does that. If capital was decentralized, i bet we would have a lot less social issues.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Capital abhors decentralization and always works towards centralization and monopolization.

That means 5 people owning everything on a long enough time scale. Then 4, then 3, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capital is a tool fundamentally i know we collectively have label modern aristocracy as capital but that's because we can't envision a world where we all own a proper share of country's economy and have it pass through generations.

I think closest concept people can understand is "middle class" aint people who had some assets that insulted them from ups and downs of the clown economy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We literally can't share the economy under capitalism. Capitalism is a tool, but it's a tool limited by its purpose.

Just like you can't use a hammer to solder a circuit board, you can't use capitalism to create a sharing economy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)