this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
404 points (98.3% liked)

Canada

8149 readers
2041 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] villasv 17 points 20 hours ago (13 children)

Unpopular take maybe…

Canada does not need to join the EU to increase trade and partnerships. More trade agreements and joint projects. The EU is a complicated political structure and joining it is unnecessarily complicateted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

They don't need to join it as a full member to have trade and economic benefits. Simple (!) alignment with standards and regulations will allow free access to the market and free movement of people.

[–] prodigalsorcerer 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Is there any reason to not join the EU if we want to align standards, regulations, and allow free movement?

The only thing I can think of that would be a hard change would be our dollar. We could possibly negotiate to keep that though - I don't know if the EU is still making exceptions like that or if that was just at the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Mainly just that we'll need to align stuff for like a decade before we can do it. Using the Euro and joining the Schengen is non-optional, although it's one of those EU things where there's a lot of chaos in actually enforcing that. Speaking of the Schengen, that would mean our own trade deals with the US are definitely dead and the border has to get much more serious, since it's now the border between the US and every country in Europe.

It would also make Kosovo and Bosnia butthurt if we got in first, so there's a chance they'd just deny it on geographical grounds - we could qualify as substantially European, but only could.

All in all, I think it's a great aspirational goal, at least, because "substantially align regulations on control of tomato leaf miner pests" isn't quite so catchy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The EU and US standards are very different and products for one can't necessarily be shipped to the other and vice versa. Examples for food include massive differences for colourings, preservatives and the like. Europe will not accept chicken washed in chlorinated water or bright froot loops. Health traffic lights are also going to be different.

While it's possible to have 2 production lines, 1 for each economic zone, that's expensive for producers and shippers.

[–] Adderbox76 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that Canada's food standards with regards to dyes and preservatives are already far closer to the EU standard than the American.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

I can only imagine what radioactive things get put in American food if that's true. Our stuff is still plenty fluorescent.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)