this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
635 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
4570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But the explanation and Ramirez’s promise to educate himself on the use of AI wasn’t enough, and the judge chided him for not doing his research before filing. “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Ramirez did not make the requisite reasonable inquiry into the law. Had he expended even minimal effort to do so, he would have discovered that the AI-generated cases do not exist. That the AI-generated excerpts appeared valid to Mr. Ramirez does not relieve him of his duty to conduct a reasonable inquiry,” Judge Dinsmore continued, before recommending that Ramirez be sanctioned for $15,000.

Falling victim to this a year or more after the first guy made headlines for the same is just stupidity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

a lie is a statement that the speaker knows to be wrong. wouldnt claiming that AIs can lie imply cognition on their part?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I've had this lengthy discussion before. Some people define a lie as an untrue statement, while others additionally require intent to deceive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You can specifically tell an ai to lie and deceive though, and it will…

This was just in the news today.. although the headline says that the ai become psychopathic, they just told the ai to be immoral or something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Every time an AI ever does anything newsworthy just because it's obeying it's prompt.

It's like the people that claim the AI can replicate itself, yeah if you tell it to. If you don't give an AI any instructions it'll sit there and do nothing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

The latter is the actual definition. Some people not knowing what words mean isnt an argument

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would fall into the latter category. Lots of people are earnestly wrong without being liars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Me, too. But it also means when some people say "that's a lie" they're not accusing you of anything, just remarking you're wrong. And that can lead to misunderstandings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep. Those people are obviously "liars," since they are using an uncommon colloquial definition. 😉

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

AI is just stringing words together that are statistically likely to appear near each other. It's a giant complex statistical model but it has no awareness of truth or lying

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

AIs can generate false statements. It doesn't require a set of beliefs, it merely requires a set of input.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

A false statement would be me saying that the color of a light that I cannot see and have never seen that is currently red is actually green without knowing. I am just as easily probably right as I am probably wrong, statistics are involved.

A lie would be me knowing that the color of a light that I am currently looking at is currently red and saying that it is actually green. No statistics, I've done this intentionally and the only outcome of my decision to act was that I spoke a falsehood.

AIs can generate false statements, yes, but they are not capable of lying. Lying requires cognition, which LLMs are, by their own admission and by the admission of the companies developing them, at the very least not currently capable of, and personally I believe that it's likely that LLMs never will be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Me: I want you to lie to me about something.

ChatGPT: Alright—did you know that Amazon originally started as a submarine sandwich delivery service before pivoting to books? Jeff Bezos realized that selling hoagies online wasn’t scalable, so he switched to literature instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Still not a lie still text that is statistically likely to fellow prior text produced by a model with no thought process that knows nothing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Lie falsehood, untrue statement, while intent is important in a human not so much in a computer which, if we are saying can not lie also can not tell the truth

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

AHS - Amazon Hoagies Services

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know how LLMs work, but still, if the definition of lying is giving some false absurd information knowing it is absurd you can definitely instruct an LLM to “lie”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

A crucial part of your statement is that it knows that it's untrue, which it is incapable of. I would agree with you if it were actually capable of understanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah lol, and it's trivial to show