this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)
Fedigrow
1095 readers
162 users here now
To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks
Resources:
- https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
- [email protected] to organize overall fediverse growth
- [email protected] to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How is there a 3 day delay in federation?
I am curious how this happens from a technical perspective.
Basically, the way Lemmy is designed, each instance has to tell each other instance what its users did (where relevant—no need to send to aussie.zone a post made in a community that there are 0 aussie.zone subscribers, for example). That includes posts, comments, and upvotes. And the way it's designed, the originating server (in this case, LW) has to send it to the receiving server (AZ), then the receiving server sends a confirmation back, and then the originating server can send the next one.
Because LW is hosted in Germany, and AZ in Australia, there's a minimum amount of time thanks to the physical constraints of sending signals over that long distance. And double that because it's a return trip, and a small amount more for processing time. It ends up measuring in the hundreds of milliseconds. Which leaves you with a maximum of a few hundred thousand actions sent from LW to AZ per day. If LW users are doing more than this, then the delay will slowly grow. If they send less, the delay will shrink, or remain at near 0.
Now, the most recent version of Lemmy actually lets you set it so that instead of sending just one at a time, you can have multiple threads, so you're sending multiple at a time. But LW only upgraded to this version a few days ago, and they didn't turn on this feature when they did so.
Wait, every single action is sent individually and the next action is sent upon confirmation of successful delivery?
This is is wild.
The wildest thing is that it has been like this for a while: https://lemmy.world/post/20575394
I guess it's good that this issue is in the process of being resolved while the network is small and primarily consists of technically minded users.
I mean, it's not being resolved, since the issue is that LW is too big to effectively federate, and LW is refusing to take the steps to improve the situation. Weirdly enough, this is less of an issue if the network scales horizontally, with a large number of small nodes.
But also, this is a symptom of the current attitude of "it shouldn't matter where the community is hosted". The fediverse is a simulacrum of centralized social media, and a poor one at that. The more we try and beat it into that shape, the more it's going to get all weird on us.
Like, a significant issue here is the insistence people have had that up/down-votes be synchronized. People want to know what the global passive-aggressive opinion on a post or comment is, rather than the local one, which requires every single button press to be sent to each and every subscribing website. And people expect stuff to be sent out as a live stream, rather than being held back for batching, too.
There's a significant cultural issue to be sorted out here. Better mechanical features aren't going to solve it in the long run.
LW is like ~35% of Lemmy's 55K MAU, right? So around ~19K MAU. For the Threadiverse to be viable on a mass scale, support for an instance with ~20K MAUs is a must. I would argue it's a must for an instance with 2 million MAUs.
This includes graceful support for up/down votes.
The issue is more about the spread of active communities and their centralization on LW.
LW comments make it just fine to Aussie.zone on this community, as it's on Lemm.ee: https://aussie.zone/post/18681158/15483480
When you look at the most active communities on the platform, the vast majority of them are on LW: https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active
I get that, I just don't think at this particular point in time (with 55K MAU) it is viable to focus on distribution of communities.
It's not like we have 10 million MAUs and we are seeing too much centralization on LW.
Let's get to at least say 500 K MAU stable and then focus on decentralization.
On the other hand, it's probably easier to decentralize while we have 55K MAU rather than 500K
That's also true, can't argue with that.
I figure this could be reduced a lot if even just 1 minute worth of votes were batched together, although I don't think the ActivityPub standard technically includes batched activities currently
Wait why didn’t they turn it on? When they upgraded I assumed this issue would be fixed.
Afaik only one item (post/comment) is synced at a time. So if there is a lot of latency between the instances, new content is produced faster than can be synced. But I'm sure someone will link the GH issue if I'm wrong
if the requests are all serialized, if the ping time is like 300ms, and if each request takes like 100ms of CPU time
that means you only need 648,000 actions in queue to equal 3 days
when you consider that even upvotes/downvotes of posts/comments count as actions, I could see it happening
but the queue isn't completely serialized anymore, so maybe this number is still a bit unbelievable (EDIT: seems like LW has not yet enabled the feature for parallel sending)
A single action cannot take 100 ms of CPU time. This does not sound realistic.
And why is this with aussie.zone only? This would be all instances, no?
Recording a vote from an already-known account is way less than 100 ms, yes. Usually it's less than 100 ms but sometimes it can be several seconds.
When an activity is received the cryptographic signature on it needs to be checked and that means sending a network request to the creator's instance to retrieve the creator's public key (and profile pic, and cover pic each of which are more network requests. Then resize and store those images).
Images in posts need to be downloaded, resized, scanned for objectionable material, etc.
Every network request is quite unpredictable as many instances are overloaded or poorly configured.
Aussie.zone might be the most extreme case, since its physical location is the farthest away from the largest Lemmy instance