this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
39 points (72.9% liked)

Canada

9318 readers
1989 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter
mp3
39
Carney May Be Better Than Poilievre, But Serious Issues Remain (www.readthemaple.com)
submitted 1 week ago by NightOwl to c/canada
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In perhaps his most disappointing policy announcement thus far, Carney has indicated he will scrap the Liberal's plan to increase the capital gains inclusion rate. This mildly progressive measure was directed squarely at the passive incomes of the wealthiest sliver of Canadians and would have served as a healthy revenue generator. Instead, it's destined for the scrapheap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wise_pancake 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I thought that line was great.

Barton had gone too far, from the swearing in ceremony complaining that 13/11 male female split was biased to demanding that implying with all rules isn’t sufficient and he’s only in this for the rich.

The question itself was accusatory. I’m so tired of this kind of politics.

It’s also a huge double standard. How can we trust Polievre to work for Canada when he has significant rental properties totalling more than Carneys stocks, and energy stocks that his policies would instantly boost? Why aren’t they asking if he will recuse himself from all housing and energy decisions?

And that’s not to say we should settle for the lowest standard, but putting hood assets in a blind trust should be considered good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Journalists hold politicians to account, and ask them to justify their decisions. If journalists don't ask accusatory questions, then they aren't doing their job.

It's totally reasonable to say that journalists should be harder on Poilievre, but that doesn't mean they should stop asking Carney questions.

[–] wise_pancake 2 points 6 days ago

It’s totally reasonable to say that journalists should be harder on Poilievre, but that doesn’t mean they should stop asking Carney questions.

My perspective is that I don’t think the attacks on Carney are warranted, a lot of them feel unreasonable and unrealistic.

If Carney’s assets are in a blind trust, he can’t list them. If they’re in a blind trust it doesn’t matter what he owned 6 months ago, because the trust may have reallocated some or all of those assets already.

The question really is “how are you enriching yourself at our expense” and honestly I do agree that journalists need to look at themselves here. I am not hearing these questions about the other side of the aisle that they’re trying to see “unbiased” towards. And that doesn’t mean that asking Carney questions has to stop, but I’m getting fed up with the coverage.