this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
1145 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

6829 readers
686 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There is a difference between a restaurant of a specific cusine and plainly deniying acommodating for common dietary preferences. Be it for health or ethical reasons. I guess in most cuisines worldwide there are either plenty of suitable dishes already available or they should be at least easy to accomodate. But sometimes it seems it's even too much of an ask to leave out some simple ingredients.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee 4 points 3 days ago

Sure. There is a scale where my example was an extreme for illustration. Your point a very reasonable one as well. If I was running a a cafe I would offer it but I am Canadian. If I were french and you asked for a baguette olive loaf you would find yourself in a guillotine. Context matters and traditions matter more than commerce in many cultures.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Deny accommodating for common dietary preference", how? Have your coffee black, there, completely lactose-free. If you ask for a latte, don't be surprised when you get milk. If you don't want milk, don't order a latte. Do you know what "latte" translates to?