this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9605 readers
1708 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. Cool your jets. I'm not deriding 338 or the usefulness of polling in general. Modelling is a very difficult science and 338 are very, very good at it.
  2. By their own numbers their likelihood of correctly projecting a seat goes down dramatically when one parties odds of a win aren't higher than 70%. Translated backwards that means that the projected riding level poll numbers you see become significantly less meaningful.

What this means is that while models like 338 are very good at predicting the overall trend of the election, in close or complicated races like the one being discussed they are not as indicative as people would like to think when it comes to, say, making tactical voting decisions. They are, ultimately, just making somewhat informed guesses about what these numbers are. In the aggregate those guesses tend to be right, but that doesn't mean you're getting accurate and direct data about how your particular riding is leaning, and people need to understand that.