this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
152 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

9624 readers
1415 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CircaV 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right wing crap “think tank” and not a serious or credible source for anything.

[–] toastmeister -4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Its not nonsense, Alberta gets 0$ in equalization payments most years. They also have a small population with extremely high corporate profits with high margins, so those corporations pay more taxes, regardless if it trickles down to workers or not. Also during a recession oil generally does okay, while other provinces are wiped out.

[–] CircaV 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Only Alberta babies constantly whinging about equalization payments. JFC. Stop begrudging QC their social programs. If AB wants social programs (🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣) then fucking pay for them with your oil billions. Stop deluding yourselves that you pay for another provinces programs. Am in Ontario, never ONCE does it cross our minds that our equalization payments go to New Brunswick or PEI or some shit. Only Alberta are douchebags this way.

[–] toastmeister -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Alberta babies are the one who are changing their referendum laws, I'm unsure what point you think you're making, is it just an attempt at an ad hominem?

[–] CircaV 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So? AB could vote 100% to leave and it will never happen. Honestly though, fucking leave. AB would be tiny seeing as AB can’t take with them what’s not theirs. Unceded Indigenous land and Indigenous land covered by treaties. Marlaina’s doing a nice job of distracting you from her huge 180k carpet cleaning bill.

[–] toastmeister -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

The theory is they're drumming up a crisis in order to get Quebec to agree to pipelines. Its not about actually separating.

Fixing that fork in the road created with 1961 National Oil Policy, that then brought up huge amounts of pain in the 70s and 80s, which basically flipped the table leading to nationalization attempts and the inevitable failure of the national energy policy.

[–] CircaV 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

That’s not ABs job. its Mark Carney’s job to convince Quebec.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

This is not entirely unlikely. And I would not prima facie be against this approach.

Except for the fact that the common people don't get nuance like this, and it just makes the division infinitely worse. The rest of Canada is going to consider Alberta to be traitors, and the part of Alberta that are traitors are going to get fired up with false hope, further stoking their hatred when they are inevitably let down.

Maybe this is the only way to get east west pipelines. Maybe there are pieces in place behind the scenes. Unfortunately I think it's unlikely to be this sophisticated, because Smith doesn't come across to me as a sophisticated thinker. I'm inclined to think the simpler explanation is that Smith is self serving and we really have rural Albertans who have grown up knowing nothing but hatred for eastern liberals, and they've been sold a bill of goods that they don't question and wouldn't understand if they did.

[–] toastmeister 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Alberta has no alternatives to export so loses a lot by shipping to the US. Alberta has a huge amount to gain by having alternative shipping routes. I think they'd be happy with things and the media would change their opinion pretty quickly.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Alberta went for many years benefiting from equalization. Saskatchewan just recently became a 'have' province after spending decades as a have not. Yes, both provinces were sucking off Ontario's tit while they were scratching dirt trying to feed themselves, and there were no complaints then...but now, conveniently when oil oligarchs started deciding the politics of those two provinces, now they become ungrateful assholes who want to keep all their money and not help anyone else. Fuck you, I got mine. A tale as old as time.

We need to nationalize oil and gas and start a proper sovereign wealth fund. Get the private money (especially US) out of there. As soon as we do that I bet all this division would fizzle out.

[–] toastmeister 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Why nationalize only oil, why not manufacturing, mining, lumber, hydro, etc..?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe 3 points 14 hours ago

Yes, to all strategic resources - hydro, oil water, telecom, probably even critical minerals.