this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
122 points (89.6% liked)

Games

38748 readers
2448 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gatekeepers in shambles

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I have to be honest here and say I don't understand where you're coming from at all.

Why should every single game be changed to suit your specific play style?

Literally nobody is asking for this. Accessibility options, not "permanently and irrevocably reduce the difficulty of all games". The good thing about options is that they're option-al. If you want the game to remain challenging, the presence of accessibility options does not affect you in the slightest. You can just ignore them and go on with your day, enjoying the game just as it was.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I have to be honest here and say I don't understand where you're coming from at all.

Thats okay! Thanks for asking. I'm coming from the place that video games are art.

If games are art, then I choose to support artists, even if they want to make weird or unconventional art. If an artist has a vision which clashes with my own I want them to be able to follow their vision that instead of always conforming to "general audiences".

As to the rest of your comment I already said first thing accessibility options are good so I'm not sure what got miscomminicated there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A. The game is actually art and the artist vision includes an option making it playable for more people

B. The game is a product that they want to sell to more people, adding difficulties sells more

I don't see the issue either way. Why care what audience it's conforming to, you'll either enjoy the game or you won't?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 hours ago

I get where you're coming from.

B. The game is a product that they want to sell to more people, adding difficulties sells more

Sure. Not not necessarily untrue.

I don't see the issue either way

My stances is forced here. I support the artists.

Unfortunately, supporting artists means sometimes you have to disagree with the businessmen when the two groups disagree.

Selling microtransactions and skins and deluxe editions and pre-order exclusive content, etc, etc all "sells more" (or at least makes more money).

If the artists feel for whatever reason adding more difficulties is too much to manage or prevents them from making the experience they want to make, I have to take the side of the artist.

There's always going to be an argument the product needs to change to make more money, that's not the art I find super interesting.

Why care what audience it's conforming to, you'll either enjoy the game or you won't?

Because I think of the people who make games as artists and it pisses me off to think of some guy in a suit pressing his fingers into the Mona Lisa and pestering Da Vinci to make her smile and show cleavage so it can sell more.

I get that a business needs to make money, but those should be decisions the artists are in the room for at least.

If it's A I don't care, if it's B I do.