this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
109 points (94.3% liked)

Canada

9808 readers
728 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Write your MP ASAP. This bill is unacceptable, unconstitutional, and unCanadian.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561 1 points 1 day ago
regular folks

I’m not even going to ask what your definition of that is.

My definition is people who aren't in organized crime, or being investigated for crimes against children.

border authorities had the power to open any and all mail weighing over 30 grams, for at least the last 30+ years.

And now that weight limit has been removed. It used to say, the Corporation may open any mail, other than a letter." Now it says, “the Corporation may open any mail.”

The weight limit was removed in 2017 via Bill C-37, because small baggies of fentanyl were getting through the mail system, and that bill closed the loophole.

And anyone sending packages knows that there's a good possibility that their package can/will be opened by border authorities. This has always been a thing.

It's important to note that the language in the bill still say that reasonable grounds for a crime (i.e. drug trafficking) must be established before any mail can be opened.

A few other sections of that specific part of the bill were repealed, so changes have already been made to tweak it.

The bottom line is that these should be considered law enforcement activities, but there’s no warrant required. Just an “Act of Parliament.” There’s no probable cause defined here. Maybe you’re fine with that. I’m not.

I've never heard of warrants being issued to open mail or packages. I've had plenty of international packages opened, and the paperwork never included a copy of a warrant.

On that note, "warrant" is mentioned 89 times in the bill, so they are still required when appropriate.

I agree with you to an extent on this one. But things are more likely to be tweaked if people make some noise.

For sure. We have a right and duty as voters to demand that a Bill like this is balanced and fair. It will be interesting to see which parts are repealed before it's passed.