this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
482 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck AI

3479 readers
747 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People do bad things for the environment all the time. It's hypocritical to drive around in a big SUV (4080 gaming GPU) and mock people driving a minivan because cars are bad for the environment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Insults aren't a rebuttal. You didn't explain your hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stop lying. Using the same car analogy isn't a copy and paste.

Doing something that sucks more while complaining about those that do things that sucks less is hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have yet to read my original comment, lmao. Not a surprise, you probably let AI think for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is what I replied to:

"Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument"

Is there something else you are referring to that I missed?

You resort to insults because you have no defense for your argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you replied calling me a hypocrite for liking one thing and disliking the other, despite me saying that both sucked?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Great argument." was sarcasm which implies you didn't believe your earlier statement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it implies it's a bad defense of AI saying a bad thing isn't as bad as another bad thing doesn't negate that the first thing is bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Calling out hypocrisy isn't a claim that one of the two bad things isn't also bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But you weren't calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I specifically called out hypocrisy! Over and over, that's all I did in my response to you.

Actually read what I wrote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You called out hypocrisy when I wasn't being hypocritical. And then despite me pointing that out atleast 3 times now you are still blinding defending AI

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You were defending the hypocritical point of view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Where? At no point was I doing that. In fact you are the one being hypocritical by defending AI but calling other things that have similar environment effects bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Don't listen to them.