this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
93 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

7609 readers
691 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes; under Mercantilism the nobles could sit around all day and their wealth would increase off the backs of the workers

Enter Capitalism where you no longer have generational wealth and pay is based on how many hours you put in. The goal is that the artisan will be the richest in society because they spend their life working

Or at least in theory; it fails when you add capitalists which just occupied the nobles branch before

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, are capitalists really added in? They're baked in the system, from where I stand. How did it ever try to solve generational wealth, when wealth can be accumulated/inherited? When was it ever about wages, and not about profit incentives and private ownership of production? And is "spending your life working" the thing we want to encourage as a society?

[–] ILikeBoobies 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If we change systems then people with wealth and power will erode it or seize the power vacuum created

Also you are correct in saying you can’t have a Capitalist nation with inheritance

A more recent example is Communism where every country that claims to adopt it doesn’t do that, instead they tend to adopt more authoritarian measures and centralized governments

Going back even further you can look at Christianity where people are supposed to be banned from having wealth but they needed to get the elite on board for it to spread

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This point of view always leaves me scratching my head. What's the point, exactly? Are we genuinely arguing that we are not living in a capitalist society?

[–] ILikeBoobies 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The point is that you’re not going to get rid of the problems unless you get rid of the people that seek power