this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7765 readers
1738 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you only go after unknowns that want to live in a remote community then all talent will go to the private sector

If you list salaries more people will call for defunding

Which further lowers quality

You saw the same thing with Post Media claiming CBC has tons of expensive real estate but they didn’t list their own holdings

[–] mp3 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CBC actually rents most of its office space now, including the new building in Montreal, it doesn't own the building. Which complicates things about leasing the space to other businesses or modifying the lease agreement depending on their financial situation in a short timeframe.

[–] ininewcrow -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't trust high priced talent of any kind ... public or private ... because they don't care what happens to any institution public or private - they'll always just go to the highest bidder.

Whereas if you have more moderately paid talent .. you have more individuals working and competing inside their organization. It would never be a utopia and there would still be lots of headaches and stupidity ... but I'd rather put my trust in 20 people rather than 1 person who is working for top dollar.

I would rather place my bets on ten potential talents ... than on one sure bet that could easily just sabotage everything and everyone to make a bit more money.

Every talent comes from somewhere and seeding those chances are liable to spring new talent more often than in endlessly holding onto one overly hyped talent that we're made to believe is irreplaceable

[–] ILikeBoobies 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 10 of those 20 worth having will be bought out and you’ll be stuck with the 10 not worth having

And with them goes their audience