this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
328 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32951 readers
970 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 10 months ago

Fuck Israel.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Netanyahu picked a bad time to provoke Biden while the pro-Israel republicans have neutered by the antisemitic hard right.

Biden has pressure from his left to call for a ceasefire and little political upside to supporting Israel. Any other year, the Republicans would be howling about how Biden is soft on Terrorism, or weak on Israel, but the Krazy KauKus is standing on the throats of that kind of conservative.

Netanyahu's strategy of relying on support from Christian Nationalists while ignoring Jewish Americans may not have been wise.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

what I don't understand is, while yes the far right is anti-semitic, are they not even more anti-islamic?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

They've gone full Archie Bunker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Judging Turtle Neck McConnell's recent pro-isrealhell speech, I think you're right.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the difference though. McConnell is old guard Republican. Far-right, but in a stodgy, slow kind of way that builds strategic alliances where needed. Trump's far right is utterly impulsive, guided by pure emotion, and completely unfettered in their hatred.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And Trump is extremely susceptible to flattery. It makes him very dangerous to have as a leader.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Trump is dangerous for so many reasons that at this point its difficult to even try to list them all.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago (3 children)

though tensions between the two allies have grown sour amid mounting U.S. concerns

Should be ...relations between the two allies have grown sour amid..., or ...tensions between the two allies have grown amid....

"tensions" growing sour makes no sense though. Are there sweet international tensions?

Can really see the deteriorating quality of journalism in the writing used. They're being paid for this. Supposedly anyway.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, I think ChatGPT wouldn't make that particular mistake. Sounding proper is its primary purpose. Maybe a cheap knockoff.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Fuck you’re probably right

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This happens sometimes in my own writing when I'm revising quickly. Of course I don't have an editor and I'm just commenting on Lemmy and Reddit, but same idea. First I write it using one phrase, then I revise it to another phrase while leaving behind a trace of the removed phrase. The final sentence might check out grammatically but not logically, so a simple grammar checker could miss it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Makes you wonder how fast they're trying to go. I do it too, and I'm not on a deadline. I'm also not a professional, working within my field though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Could just be a way of saying, like, tensions have grown worse. When things sour, they get worse. Unless it's sour cream. Or citrus. Or pickles.

I dunno I'm not a linguist.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

Nobody wants that fucking trash bag in this country anyway.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago

Good, I don't want us pandering to a fascist anyway.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Is Israel going to defy the Security Council to invade Rafah?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Depends. Is the security council going to do anything about it if they do?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They can use it to impose sanctions. Breaking international law, as much as contrarians like to claim otherwise, can come with consequences. No I don't think blue helmets are going to be deployed but these things aren't toothless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It feels like either it will be theater with a sternly worded letter delivered or Israel will actually get some real consequences. Not really much in between.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They've already invaded Rafah. They did it without any press releases because they knew it would create even more international pressure.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Of course they will. This little spat with America over how difficult the genocide is for Biden's campaign hasn't slowed down the flow of material aid. They know they can do whatever they want, they've pushed as far as broadly declared and publicised genocide without significant consequences, really the only boundary they have left to test is nuking Tehran or something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Does the pope shit in the woods?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Does the tin man have a sheet metal cock?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

That he was even welcome in the first place after all he's said and done is in itself absolutely unacceptable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

I feel like the US Abstaining instead of vetoing is bigger news than this doofus throwing a hissy fit about it

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

What a pathetic little bitch

[–] theacharnian 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Bloodbath Bibi? Get some alliteration?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Nazi Netanyahu

[–] sndmn 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only place he should be welcomed to is the Hague.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Good. Actions not words.

Israel announced the biggest annexation of the west bank since 1990s when Blinken was in Israel a few days ago.

Any time Israel comes to visit they just openly embarrass Biden.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Awks.

After 911 , The US obliterated Iraq leaving 1 million dead and they didn’t even do it .

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

It's almost like the people of the world realized that was a mistake to turn a blind eye or listen to the bullshit that was used to justify it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I just noticed the amount of IDF stooges here supporting Israel has plummeted since the start of the war in October. Maybe they finally realized they actually are the baddies.