this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
322 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19625 readers
4758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump faced backlash after launching the $TRUMP cryptocurrency meme coin, valued at billions, days before his inauguration.

Experts, including former ethics officials, called it a major conflict of interest, as Trump has pledged pro-crypto policies while profiting personally.

First Lady Melania also launched her own coin, $MELANIA.

Critics warn the coins, which lack intrinsic value and are highly volatile, could lead to lawsuits and public losses.

Ethics experts described the move as one of the worst conflicts of interest in modern U.S. presidential history.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (28 children)

For my own mental health, I have to change "America voted for corruption" (which isn't necessarily wrong) to "Not enough Americans voted against corruption". Looking at you, everyone who stayed home or threw their vote away on non-viable third party protest votes.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Not that this helps, but it should be "Americans voted for white nationalism" and "Not enough people voted against racism".

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"America" did not. I'm sick of these articles making it sound like he won big. He didn't. 1.43% . The smallest margin of victory in 25 years.

His idiot followers have no critical thinking skills and voted for all the lies he told them which they are up. They're going to be absolutely devastated under his presidency.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget all the qualified people who didn't vote at all, and instead just said "Meh, it's fine."

Not voting is a choice.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, although personally I think "America didn't give enough of a shit to do even the bare minimum of voting" is no less damning.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

That is precisely what I meant.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

They're not going to be devastated. No matter how much worse off they will become, they will think they are doing better because the mainstream media of Fox and OAN will tell them they are doing better than ever.

They were fighting for toilet paper under Trump.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

They won't be devastated. They'll continue to watch the same "news" that will tell them how great the country is doing no matter what happens... and then continue to say how awful the Democrats are, and to blame them for individual problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A plurality of Americans voted for him. It wasn't even EC shenanigans this time. It wasn't a huge margin, no, but more Americans who voted wanted him than any other candidate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is not the right use of the word "plurality". A "plurality" voted for Harris as well. Stop trying to disguise what you're saying.

Trump barely one, and it may have had to do with small segments voting in kind. It was not a landslide nor mandate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

plurality: a number of votes cast for a candidate in a contest of more than two candidates that is greater than the number cast for any other candidate but not more than half the total votes cast

Trump: 77,303,568

Harris: 75,019,230

Others: 2,877,973

75,019,230 + 2,877,973 = 77,897,203

Trump won a plurality of votes. No, it was not a landslide or a mandate, and I never said it was.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just popping in to say the guy you're responding to is a serial moron I blocked ages ago. It's no use arguing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I was debating whether I should go ahead and do that. I shall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A "plurality" is two, friend.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Words can have more than one definition, friend, and "plurality" has a specific one when referring to voting. I literally linked which definition I'm using.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm sick of these articles

Let's be very clear that corporate news has failed so spectacularly, they can not recover from this. They will not change, and we shouldn't give them any benefit of doubt.

You will need to find a different way of getting the news than from CNN / NBC / NYT or whatever it used to be in the before-times.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Donald Trump faced backlash...

Yeah, from people who have been crying foul about Trump for years now. Unfortunately his supporters just don't give a shit. Why aren't they asking Republican senators and representatives about the president launching his own currency? They're the dumb fucks that should be offering up backlash but aren't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The corporate news sewer spew begins. You can drink all you want, but it never gets any better and it costs a lot to do it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, no shit. We are a nation of fucking morons.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Manufactured morons. That's been the Rs goal since Reagan at the latest.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Earlier. Southern Strategy, it's what helped Reagan get into power.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could this be the end of the American empire?

With this blatant and chaotic corruption, criminality, exploitation, cheating, and stealing, how could the US stay a world empire? Won't we just spiral out of control and everything that made us the world leader fade away, die off, emigrate, or become ineffectual?

If cheating is now encouraged by the highest leader and law of the land, why wouldn't it spread everywhere in our system?

I'm not hopeful. Scary times!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

In my opinion, most likely yes!

But empires can take decades/centuries to fall. I'm aure it's different in the modern age with modern technology but america might still hold out for decades

I'd argue that the American Empire has been in decline for decades now, however

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really? Strump and Smelania?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Heh, yup. Whole lot of suckers about to be robbed of their last dollar in the next few years.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I don't have a problem with people launching meme coins for fun. They're consenting adults, if they want to risk thousands of dollars on a meme, that's their choice. But an elected official who has the power to pass laws regulating cryptocurrency doing it? Yikes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

You have to be an expert to realize that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

After they duped idiots out of millions with the Trump coin, they quickly (in 1 day) threw together the Melania coin. Because they saw how easy it was to pump their base for money, so they just did it twice because why not?

No way this is legal, but with Trump that doesn't seem to matter one bit. They also state it has nothing to do with the presidency or any government related thing, but I don't really see how that's possible if it's the official coin of the (at time of launch) president elect. Not that any of this will ever go to court, but still.

I wouldn't be surprised if they release a Junior coin somewhere in the next months, the Trump base is so far gone they will continue to throw their money on the grift that is Trump.

load more comments
view more: next ›