For my own mental health, I have to change "America voted for corruption" (which isn't necessarily wrong) to "Not enough Americans voted against corruption". Looking at you, everyone who stayed home or threw their vote away on non-viable third party protest votes.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Not that this helps, but it should be "Americans voted for white nationalism" and "Not enough people voted against racism".
"America" did not. I'm sick of these articles making it sound like he won big. He didn't. 1.43% . The smallest margin of victory in 25 years.
His idiot followers have no critical thinking skills and voted for all the lies he told them which they are up. They're going to be absolutely devastated under his presidency.
Don't forget all the qualified people who didn't vote at all, and instead just said "Meh, it's fine."
Not voting is a choice.
True, although personally I think "America didn't give enough of a shit to do even the bare minimum of voting" is no less damning.
That is precisely what I meant.
They're not going to be devastated. No matter how much worse off they will become, they will think they are doing better because the mainstream media of Fox and OAN will tell them they are doing better than ever.
They were fighting for toilet paper under Trump.
They won't be devastated. They'll continue to watch the same "news" that will tell them how great the country is doing no matter what happens... and then continue to say how awful the Democrats are, and to blame them for individual problems.
A plurality of Americans voted for him. It wasn't even EC shenanigans this time. It wasn't a huge margin, no, but more Americans who voted wanted him than any other candidate.
This is not the right use of the word "plurality". A "plurality" voted for Harris as well. Stop trying to disguise what you're saying.
Trump barely one, and it may have had to do with small segments voting in kind. It was not a landslide nor mandate.
Harris: 75,019,230
Others: 2,877,973
75,019,230 + 2,877,973 = 77,897,203
Trump won a plurality of votes. No, it was not a landslide or a mandate, and I never said it was.
Just popping in to say the guy you're responding to is a serial moron I blocked ages ago. It's no use arguing.
Thanks, I was debating whether I should go ahead and do that. I shall.
A "plurality" is two, friend.
Words can have more than one definition, friend, and "plurality" has a specific one when referring to voting. I literally linked which definition I'm using.
I'm sick of these articles
Let's be very clear that corporate news has failed so spectacularly, they can not recover from this. They will not change, and we shouldn't give them any benefit of doubt.
You will need to find a different way of getting the news than from CNN / NBC / NYT or whatever it used to be in the before-times.
Donald Trump faced backlash...
Yeah, from people who have been crying foul about Trump for years now. Unfortunately his supporters just don't give a shit. Why aren't they asking Republican senators and representatives about the president launching his own currency? They're the dumb fucks that should be offering up backlash but aren't.
The corporate news sewer spew begins. You can drink all you want, but it never gets any better and it costs a lot to do it.
Yeah, no shit. We are a nation of fucking morons.
Manufactured morons. That's been the Rs goal since Reagan at the latest.
Earlier. Southern Strategy, it's what helped Reagan get into power.
Could this be the end of the American empire?
With this blatant and chaotic corruption, criminality, exploitation, cheating, and stealing, how could the US stay a world empire? Won't we just spiral out of control and everything that made us the world leader fade away, die off, emigrate, or become ineffectual?
If cheating is now encouraged by the highest leader and law of the land, why wouldn't it spread everywhere in our system?
I'm not hopeful. Scary times!
In my opinion, most likely yes!
But empires can take decades/centuries to fall. I'm aure it's different in the modern age with modern technology but america might still hold out for decades
I'd argue that the American Empire has been in decline for decades now, however
Really? Strump and Smelania?
Heh, yup. Whole lot of suckers about to be robbed of their last dollar in the next few years.
I don't have a problem with people launching meme coins for fun. They're consenting adults, if they want to risk thousands of dollars on a meme, that's their choice. But an elected official who has the power to pass laws regulating cryptocurrency doing it? Yikes.
You have to be an expert to realize that?
Melania coin? Absurd.
After they duped idiots out of millions with the Trump coin, they quickly (in 1 day) threw together the Melania coin. Because they saw how easy it was to pump their base for money, so they just did it twice because why not?
No way this is legal, but with Trump that doesn't seem to matter one bit. They also state it has nothing to do with the presidency or any government related thing, but I don't really see how that's possible if it's the official coin of the (at time of launch) president elect. Not that any of this will ever go to court, but still.
I wouldn't be surprised if they release a Junior coin somewhere in the next months, the Trump base is so far gone they will continue to throw their money on the grift that is Trump.