this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
54 points (77.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36694 readers
1431 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: Traffic Speed. Everyone always exceed the speed limit on highways. Why do we still have the limit? Like, either enforce it, or remove it. This stuff doesn't make sense at all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 50 minutes ago

People exceed the speed limit on highways, but usually not by a lot. If they exceed it by a lot, it is usually enforced, e.g. by speed cameras; but of course some people still sometimes get away with it, no enforcement of any law is perfect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Everyone always exceed the speed limit on highways.

Is this some kind of American thing?

[–] Grappling7155 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Canada too. Sometimes it seems like the speed “limit” is actually the minimum most people are expected to go (if possible) on Ontario’s highways, especially the busiest ones. Enforcement is almost entirely done manually and barely exists, if it’s being done at all.

A lot of roads and highways are very over-engineered here with wide & forgiving lanes, with broad shoulders at the side. The actual speeds that can be accommodated in the design are far greater than the posted limit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Grappling7155 2 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

North American driving culture sucks. For the past 70 years cars have dominated at the expense of all other modes of travel. They’re deeply embedded into our culture, infrastructure, planning processes, transportation engineering, and daily lives. They have become synonymous with freedom of movement for a lot of people who can’t imagine any different way to get around. Speed limits and enforcement in their minds are seen as an infringement on their rights. It will be a long and uncertain process to enact change, ripe for disruption and setbacks, but the status quo isn’t working, we’ve hit the limits of cars’ ability to scale, and with the internet showing how things are in the rest of the world, some people are waking up to what’s possible when you aren’t dependent on cars to get around safely and reliably.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

no idea where you're from, but it's true in many European countries too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Not sure if it's an "American" thing...

This is the Interstate-95 on the PA-NJ Turnpike section, a two-hour long drive by car (at 60 Miles Per Hour speed, that is)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

expected ... traffic speed

You're not supposed to be speeding you know?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

Tell that to like 99% of drivers on the Interstate-95 around the PA-NJ Turnpike section (USA btw).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago

It's so the police always have something they can stop you for.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago

When minor things are against the rules which are selectively enforced, it means the authorities get to pick and choose who to punish based on whatever criteria they feel like, which gives them power.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

What is a speed limit on highways?

Confused greetings from Germany.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Speed limits are somewhat enforced in Germany. Just because you can floor it at times does not mean you can go 100 in a 50.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

I don't think everyone always breaks the speed limit, but probably they do at some point during every journey. They knew this went they introduced the 20mph speed limit but they introduced it anyway because they thought it would reduce the average speed by a few mph.

https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/365789/do-20mph-speed-limits-save-lives-100-fewer-casualties-wales-sparks-uk-debate

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

You're not expected to break them. For your example, you're not supposed to go over the speed limit. And it is, in fact, extremely easy to do so. Most people are fine with it. And, no, it's not impossible to do so. There is nothing forcing you to go faster for little to no gain and increased risk for you and other.

You expecting to go over tells something about you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Practically no one actually drives at or below the speed limit in the US, especially on freeways. Whether or not you personally like this doesn't matter -- it's just how it is.

You're welcome to try it, but speeding is so pervasive in our culture that this will single you out and Ruggedly Individualistic Americans will get frothingly butthurt at you over it. Prepare to get tailgated, cut off, bullied out of your lane, stuff thrown at your car, etc.

[–] howrar 1 points 1 hour ago

It's not just a matter of others getting butthurt. It's actively dangerous to be driving at a different speed from the rest of traffic, regardless of whether you're going faster or slower.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're proud of your culture of not giving a crap about rules set to improve safety for everyone. On that account, I agree that we'll never see eye to eye about this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What part of what I wrote expressed that I was "proud" of it?

I'm just telling you how people behave. I don't have any control over anybody but myself. For what it's worth, I'm probably one of the six people in this damn country who doesn't drive like a nut.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

You expecting to go over tells something about you.

I don't drive, but every time I’m in my parent’s car, they drive the speed limit, then I see cars flying by on the highway, and I’m like wtf.

I double check the spedometer, it points at just below 60, the sign says speed limit is 60. How is everyone going so fast. They must be speeding.

Not just one or 2 cars. Like almost every car.

Edit: This is in the USA, the Interstate-95 / PA-NJ Turnpike btw.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Traffic speed? If you know where all the speed cameras are, you could dodge them and hope there are no other police checking you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's the whole fucking point. Speed traps are only there to decrease the number of people killed, and we still have idiots complaining about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Speed traps don't stop or prevent crime/accidents, they generate money. In fact, one could argue a police speed traps causes accidents when a group of cars in the front suddenly slam on their brakes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago

a group of cars in the front suddenly slam on their brakes.

A group of speeding cars in the front suddenly slam on their brakes.

You are the problem. That's why I would enjoy if all those fucking morons had their license removed for life and they had to take the bus. I have to avoid accidents every fucking day because of them and I don't see why I have to suffer for that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, about that: China also randomly flies drones that patrols the highways. Of couse, that's getting into the Authoritarian territory, and people in Democracies don't like it, but it is an option.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

IMHO it's not authoritarian. Your speed in public space should be public. I struggle every day with fucking idiots in BMW or VW who almost hit my car because they can't drive properly. I wouldn't mind seeing them in jail if it meant some kind of control on my own speed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ehh, for a bit Virginia tried enforcing them with aircraft.

It stopped because it was expensive, not because it was too authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Manned Aircraft is much more expensive than drones, especially fuel cost. You can get like a DJI drone for like around $2000 (there are cheaper ones, but then you have to fly closer, since the cameras sucks on the cheaper ones) with good enough cameras to see the license plates by flying just hovering outside of the edge of the highway (so that, if it fails for some reason, it falls outside of the highway and doesn't affect the traffic), and angle it towards the highway, and you'll see all the license plates clearly, and with the help of the distance markers on the side of the road, determine their speed. As long as they don't crash the drones, they are gonna last a long time, and if batteries are worn out, they can just get new ones. It's not exactly "cheap", but the government has a lot of budget. Getting like 20 of these can cover a lot of area. You don't have to catch every one, just enough to make people think again before trying to speed. And randomly change the locations of patrol so there is no way to predict where they are being watched.

Also, they can get like some expensive ones, some cheap ones, mix and match. The cheaper ones will have trouble getting a clear license plate if it also have to keep a safe distance, but the people don't know which drones are the expensive ones, get like 20 DJI Mavics, 40 DJI Mini 2 SE, mix them up. Think of like having real cameras mixed in with fake cameras.

I know it looks expensive, but just look at the police budget and it's barely a dent. Cut out all of those "riot suppression" (aka: protest suppression) stuff from the budget and you got a lot of budget to work with.

As for manpower, redirect those writing tickets in the city, and teach them how to fly these drones. Parking violations have basically zero harm, fuck that shit, speeding has more potential to cause harm than parking violations.

[–] jerkface 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

just magically "enforce" it with no unintended consequences, please

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

This sounds like a distinctly cultural problem where the word 'limit' clearly doesn't mean very much to the population in question.

It's a limit, not a target, and certainly not a floor as some USAsians seem to treat it.

Here in Australia you can be fined for exceeding the limit by less than 10km/h. Yes, even if you are 1km/h over, and whilst this would probably get thrown out in court you'd still have to take time off to attend court.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

In the US it's technically a target, since you can be ticketed for going too fast or too slow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

On the highways here, the original speed limit of 55 was to save our nation's resources, not just "55 to stay alive" but also it was an efficient speed to maintain and still pretty fast.

Inside the city it works much better to make drivers feel unsafe going fast. Narrower lanes, speed bumps, roundabouts, etc.

In answer to your actual question - some laws are just old and haven't been unwound yet and others are used as pretext for profiling, police (or,n more properly whoever is running them) like to be able to stop people for no reason but that can be seen as illegitimate, so they keep laws that everyone breaks, jaywalking, etc to have an excuse.

I don't think there is any one law everybody breaks really but also no person who has lived perfectly law abiding life.

[–] canadaduane 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 14 hours ago

You seem to be assuming that people would keep driving as they currently do if we removed speed limits entirely. I'd be willing to bet that this is not the case. Most drivers have a number in mind on how much they're willing to exceed the speed limit. For me that is 5 - 10kph, so if the limit is 60kph, then you're not going to catch me going 80. Without speed limits I probably would.

So why do we have such laws? Because they work. Not perfectly but to some extent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago

I'm too German to understand what's here.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because it can be enforced selectively, and if everyone is guilty of something, anyone in particular can be harassed under the cover of a legal justification.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. And in some places, one can see the enforcement is against minoritites and other scape goats at a disproportionate level. This also has the "bonus" of being able to make one group look like they break the law much more often and are dangerous

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Yep. In Switzerland not having your ID on you is an arrest-able offence. Of course, the police never check the ID of anyone white or who blends in.

But if you look brown / disabled, then they will check you…

load more comments
view more: next ›