this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
69 points (85.6% liked)

Superbowl

3704 readers
653 users here now

For owls that are superb.

US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now

International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com

Australia Rescue Help: WIRES

Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org

If you find an injured owl:

Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.

Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.

Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.

If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.

For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lol...it hit me square in the teeth the other day, so I just HAD to try my hand. 😂

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

I'd rather see a Funkadelic of owls...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Birds...owls...

Powlament?

Does it involve a play on the words cloaca or nictitating membrane? More like...nictitating NO brains, am I right?

In short, the owl glossary didn't help.

EDIT:

I FIGURED IT OUT. I'm such a fucking idiot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Ahahaha I only know this because I had to google it for a joke at work yesterday

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Okay I give up. Someone spoil me.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Oh, I thought it was kind of a Hoos Hoo of government.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh. There are some humans (non-owls) in there, so I thought the joke had something to do with them.

AI spoils my fun. Again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

yay! I got it! I just wasn't sure I got it until somebody said it explicitly 😅

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think most of the planet would like to see a multitude of crows in the oval office.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Now this is subtlety! 😉

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

dirt_owl is the superb owl this is easy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Owldeeeeeer!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this is subtle?

spoilerWhat an interesting group

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Now would you even say... legislative...?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The level of sloppiness of this AI slop is especially high

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For sure! But the only reason I prodded the AI forward in such a way was to produce a silly joke. For a silly reason. For a well-known reason!

Or not...?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On one hand I do appreciate you posting on the Fediverse and supplying a nice joke for us, on another, AI… it's not exactly popular here and I can understand why. I think you might have posted something about that in Fedigrow before?

You might want to at least label this image as AI-generated. Obviously I know this is not a real picture, people don't walk around with owl heads instead of person heads, but I'm one of those folk still really easily fooled by AI images and without people in the comments talking about it I definitely would have thought some artist made this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Nope, not me. Check my history to see my business...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

I'll take your word for it. Checking history always makes me feel somehow creepy, and if I do not suspect you of purposeful bad-faith engagement (then I'd want to see what the rest of your engagement looks like so I could judge if it is a bad-faith post) I have no reason to bother. Sorry for the mixup!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Joke is fine, it’s just sad to see something that looks so grotesque in a community otherwise devoted to nature photography and an appreciation of these beautiful animals.

Not that my opinion should necessarily be relevant to you in any way but I think taking the 10 mins to paste actual owl heads over an actual photo of a…room full of important looking people…would have been funnier while also actually possessing some aesthetic value

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

it’s just sad to see something that looks so grotesque in a community otherwise devoted to nature photography and an appreciation of these beautiful animals.

Right mate, but WHAT EXACTLY sheltered world do you live in, in which a terrible disaster happens 'pon a wayward, funny owl post, eh?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah yeah with the sheltering and the big disaster. Listen dog, everything’s okay right now. We’re cool. Your joke is nice like I said. The image looks like trash, and I told you so directly because I’d rather not see trash here. You “prodded” it into existence in one second, right? Why get so defensive about it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the sheltering and the big disaster

Okay, I'm listening!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Is this your final comment? You spammed a bunch of angry nonsense then deleted it over a period of three hours. I can still see the full text of all that in my inbox btw.

Genuinely just sad. And now what do you even want with this last message? Good job listening, here’s a gold star lol? This is really the zinger you finally settled on after all that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is Superbowl - where we give a hoot.