We're already here. Can we stop dancing around with "here's this way you'll know" or "we're coursing towards this!"?
We. Are. Here. Already.
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
282 points (97.3% liked)
politics
20567 readers
5204 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why are they talking like this might happen? JFC it's happening.
The easiest sign is when you're bombarded with instructions about how to recognize if you're in a dictatorship.
Alternatively, the easier sign (since a good chunk of the courts are complicit) is when we started being ruled by decree. The second easiest is when language is getting policed.
After checking my notes, that started January 20, 2025, when sweeping Executive Orders were decreed that are being treated as the force of law when they most certainly are not. The removal of "T" from LGBTQ, and enforcement of the stupid, unilateral renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is the other.
Congratulations, we live in a dictatorship.
Id argue its still in pieces thanks to the states, itll be felt more directly in say Arkansas rather than say California. Though I guess thats like comparing Nizhy Novgorod to the Vladivostok, but its still a factor to consider.
We are.
LOL there's a MILLION ways we know. another big way is how the MSM fucking ignores them all
Here's one big way you can tell if the US if becoming a dictatorship:
Did Trump get elected? If yes, then it is.
We've been in a crypto-fascist state since Dubya. We had so many rights to question our government revoked, and even the ones who loved it had theirs removed too. Loyalty to the party didn't secure anything.
This is just the final nail in the coffin. Dubya tried to pretend he was on the side of the American public. Trump doesn't. Mask off, showing what America has always wanted to do and become since Nixon.
in other countries, the last hope was the military siding with the people
Did you see this:
That's where we're at
Thanks for this, i had no clue.
(transcript below of the last of those 3 notes ... hope i did not make too much typos ...)
3.C.1.A.6. (U) Any soldier currently under medical care for gender dysphoria or transition will continue to receive medical treatment consistent with the standard of care.
I did not see this, this is excellent news. Thank you for sharing this.
I don’t think trans veterans killing themselves in the VA is gonna do much for morale.
Yeah, trans veterans aren't the majority of veterans. While it's horrific what's being done to them, it's not really going to have any impact on the military resisting a dictatorship.
Don't worry, we're defunding the VA. They'll kill themselves in the streets instead
Back to Vietnam! Hopefully don't also go back to post ww1 where they sent tanks after veterans asking for their war benefits
This is how how you get Rambo.
Hopefully.
Not like they are known for caring about the troops ever. They love posing with them, and that's about it
Musks little brat told Trump to shut his mouth and go away the other day so at least the situation is not without some comedy. So we have that going for us. And Luigi. Not a whole lot else though.
Huh. TIL:
The looming obstacle to deployment of civil contempt against Trump’s merry band of constitutional arsonists is the reality that judges do not arrest or imprison people themselves. Nor does the judicial branch have its own armed employees to arrest those who defy its orders or its own jails in which to hold prisoners. Those jobs are performed by the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Prisons … which are both components of the DOJ and are thus subordinate to the attorney general, who is subordinate to Trump. Even an order imposing a fine can be enforced only against a noncompliant defendant by action of the Justice Department.
Pretty good article on why refusing to enforce a contempt order would really be the South Bank of the Rubicon.
Will knowing about it enable me to do literally anything about it or is this just going to give me an ulcer to go with my other old man diseases?
You can do something about it every day. PolRev, 50501, inequality.org, theres a new resistance group every day. Now is the time to disobey. Cast your die.
Joining a political action committee will lack the... catharsis I'm looking for
Then grab that catharsis! I'm about it right now.
Shrödinger's ToS violation
Pink mist?