this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37635 readers
1568 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Does the GDPR define what the default behavior should be when the user refuses to specify? Does it vary by site? Is it like clicking either "Accept all" or "Reject all"?

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

There is no reject all in GDPR, because functional cookies are still allowed. So the default behaviour is only functional cookies are allowed.

Edit: Companies have been fined for making cookie options too complicated, under GDPR all other cookies are opt-in. This is what a banner should look like:

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Any way i can report a website for violating this rule because I see it constantly everywhere and it seems to have no consequences.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

GDPR infringements are categorized by severity and impact to its users, but also by the yearly turnover by said company. Meaning cookie banners by smaller companies are low priority.

You could try contacting the relevant Data Protection Authority from your country or the providers country.

https://www.edpb.europa.eu/about-edpb/about-edpb/members_en

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Good to know that's the default. I do definitely see prompts that have "Reject all", plus some banners that only have "Accept all" and "Cookie settings", with "Reject all" or "Necessary cookies only" only visible in the cookie settings. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So if I open the cookies settings and deselect all that can be deselected, is it the same as necessary cookies only?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Correct, if you want to live cookieless on the internet you have to disable them in browser. But as others have said, this will break the majority of websites.

Functional cookies can never be used for identifiable information, only to ensure the functionality of the website.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What functionality do they ensure? I understand web games and webapps, but like any website now has cookies

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Sometimes people store simple data, like a boolean, in it.

When I tried to make a website with some funny functions everything I read said to store data in cookies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

There's many reasons, site specific settings like selecting a language or if a certain popup message been dismissed by the user so it's not shown again. Sorting settings, dark/light mode or what stage of the signup process the user is at.

Altough I agree many aren't a necessity and could be eliminated by better software design.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Legally, the user has NOT allowed ANY cookies then. (The law still allows the technically needed ones)

But in practice, it is not easy to find out what a website does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

and in practice, if you want a website not to recognize you from one place to the next, you need to make it TECHNICALLY impossible for them to do that (depending on severity: private browsing, IP changing, Tor), not just legally declare you don't want them to

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a question, it's maybe stupid but still:

Aren't cookies, like, files on your device?? Can't you just forbid websites to write anything to disk??

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Legally, you are right.

Technically, browsers do not offer all settings that you can dream of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It’s not just about cookies, they spy on you in other ways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Install privacy possom and be done with it I say. You can set it to auto reject those popups

[–] Grappling7155 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Try Consent-O-Matic if you’re tired of doing it manually for each website

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Or Superagent!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

they shove all their "special" cookies up your computer's ass and it gets super stoned and forgets it's not supposed to tell you about how they've already taken over the world.

legally as mentioned elsewhere, it's supposed to treat it as a rejection, except for "necessary" cookies. but, eh.... I'm not sure I would trust that. if there's a website you're concerned pushing cookies, use firefox's private window mode. (I wouldn't trust chrome to not just pretend like incognito actually did something. while it really does nothing.) all cookies are sandboxed, and deleted after you close the browser.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

The incident is reported

[–] Adderbox76 0 points 5 days ago

What happens when I ignore the cookie preference dialogue on websites?

You get stuck with the leftovers; which is usually the maple flavour or those really really dry shortbread cookies that feel like dust in your mouth. And you're not allowed a drink of milk to wash it down.

It helps to get in line early for your cookie preferences.

What? ... Wrong cookies?

Sorry about that. I stand by what I said however.