this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
401 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

8131 readers
1948 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This Black History Month, it’s important to recognize that economic injustice—both in Canada and around the world—is deeply rooted in racism. The property system in Canada was founded on the forced displacement and exclusion of Indigenous peoples from their land and immigration policies that prevented non-white immigration, effectively barring many thousands of people from accessing property in Canada. These racialized colonial systems laid the foundation for the current racial wealth gap, where racialized Canadians have about half as much wealth as their non-racialized counterparts.

Unlike the United States, where constitutional barriers have historically shielded the ultra-rich from direct taxation, Canada faces no such constitutional legal obstacles—only political ones. And those political excuses are running out.

A wealth tax enjoys overwhelming public support. Nearly 90 percent of Canadians back it, yet successive Liberal and Conservative governments have refused to act. Their refusal isn’t due to legal constraints but to the immense influence of corporate lobbyists and billionaire donors who oppose any effort to make them pay their fair share.

Just last year, powerful corporate interests mobilized to kill a progressive tax measure that would have primarily targeted Canada’s wealthiest citizens and corporations: the partial closure of the capital gains loophole.

(page 2) 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It doesn't seem like the article ever explains what a wealth tax is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Works similar to property taxes you pay on a house or a car....

[–] LostWon 1 points 1 day ago

We can point people to Gary Stevenson for down-to-earth explanations on how this should work. He's been campaigning for wealth taxes in the UK, but also acknowledges the issue is global. He has a playlist you can point people to that want to understand the issues better. Long story short though, he emphasizes taxing difficult-to-move physical assets like commercial properties.

Recently, clips have circulated where he debated Piers Morgan and Dave Rubin at the same time on why excess wealth must be taxed. That said, I think he explains things just as well and in better detail on his own channel.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A tax on wealth only with zero loopholes to avoid it.

[–] HungryJerboa 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It needs to cover capital gains because of how many measure their wealth by unrealized stock gains.

Also estate tax loopholes need closing so generational inequality doesn't worsen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Ok. But poor people never have capital gains or pay estate taxes.

I simplified my explanation by putting it in easy-to-understand terms.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WorkshopBubby -3 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I don't think a wealth tax is smart. I think the current slate of billionaires that are aligned with fascism should be rounded up and executed. But I am pretty sure every economist agrees that a wealth tax doesn't make any sense mathematically. People have a bunch of stock either because of founding companies or investing early, and then the public gets to buy the stock, if the public thinks a company is valuable the stock rises and people become wealthy. It doesn't mean that they actually have that much money that they can deploy. I think it makes more sense to have rules that prevent people using their stock as collateral for loans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey champ check this one out...

We all pay property taxes on houses we own or rent... so why can't owner of stock pay a property tax?

Asking for a friend.

[–] WorkshopBubby 0 points 1 day ago

Okay so how would it work? Would you tax once a year based on the value of their portfolio?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›